|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:68-73
© 1998 Mosby, Inc.
Surgery For Adult Cardiovascular Disease |
From the Cardiovascular Surgery Department at Türkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Received for publication July 1, 1997. Revisions requested Oct. 14, 1997; revisions received Feb. 17, 1998. Accepted for publication Feb. 23, 1998. Address for reprints: Kerem M. Vural, MD, N. Tandogan cad. 5/6 Kavaklidere 06540, Ankara, Turkey.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Operative technique
Our operative technique was described in detail in our previous publications.
1,3 In brief, after median sternotomy, wet gauze pads or retracting sutures were placed for purposes of fixation or exposure. If copious rinsing with warm saline solution was insufficient to control bleeding, we applied an atraumatic bulldog clamp about 1.5 cm proximal to the coronary artery (together with the surrounding fat pad) during the anastomosis. A simple intermittent regional immobilization method was applied to facilitate the anastomosis. During the manipulation of the native coronary vessel (i.e., arteriotomy, needle passage), the surgeon and the first assistant grasped the opposite sides of adjacent epicardium with pick-ups, pulling up with slight tension. Thus about 2 to 3 cm of epicardial segment was rendered motionless, with the heart beating underneath. After the anastomosis was completed but before the suture was tied, a 1 or 1.5 mm probe was passed through the coronary artery, not only to check the anastomosis, but also to dilate possible native coronary vessel spasm caused by the temporary hemostatic bulldog clamp application.
Our criteria for a perioperative myocardial infarction were as follows: (1) a newly formed Q wave on the electrocardiogram; (2) creatine kinase MB levels exceeding 50 U/L, especially with a concordant later increase in aspartate aminotransferase; (3) poor R-wave progression in precordial leads (so-called R amputation). Early mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction, and low cardiac output state were recorded for the first postoperative month. Operative data are shown in Table II
.
Statistical analysis
Means are presented ± 1 standard deviation and proportions are accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CI). Predictors for mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction, and nonfatal low cardiac output state were first analyzed by Fisher's exact test (univariable analysis). Odds ratios with 95% confidence limits were also represented. Logistic regression analysis (multivariable analysis) was then performed for ranking the mortality predictors determined by univariable analysis. Statistical analysis was performed and interpreted by a certified statistician (see acknowledgments). All statistics were obtained by SPSS software (version 6.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill.).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Low cardiac output state and the incremental risk factors
Apart from the preoperative prophylactic use of the intraaortic balloon pump in 14 patients (0.7%; CI, 0.4% to 1.2%) with severely impaired left ventricular function, 28 additional patients (1.4%; CI, 0.9% to 2.0%) needed balloon pump support in the early postoperative period. Nonfatal postoperative low cardiac output state developed in 58 patients (2.8%; CI, 1.2% to 3.6%, Table VI
). Predictors for nonfatal postoperative low cardiac output state were age over 70 years, preoperative poor left ventricular function (as described above), a poor quality and/or small caliber LAD artery, and nongrafted disease of the circumflex system (Table IV
, right columns).
Homologous transfusion requirements
The average first day and total chest tube drainage was 829 ± 345 ml and 932 ± 395 ml, respectively. An average of 0.4 ± 0.86 units of homologous packed red cells per patient and 1.9 ± 1.16 units of fresh frozen plasma per patient were administered. No homologous blood or packed red cell transfusion was required in 74% of the patients.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The current mortality rate among our patients is 1.9% and the perioperative myocardial infarction rate is 2.9%. Univariable analysis showed no association between poor ventricular function and early hospital mortality. In a study by Magovern and colleagues,
8 CABG (with standard CPB technique) was been offered as an alternative surgical approach to patients with congestive heart failure with a good early and midterm outcome expectancy. In this high-risk group, operative mortality was 4%. Off-pump CABG may offer even lower mortality rates and encourage the surgeon to consider CABG before other therapeutic modalities such as transplantation, cardiomyoplasty, or medical management. Another interesting finding was that the logistic regression analysis identified nongrafted circumflex stenoses as a risk factor. That brings up another issue that may relate to the long-term follow-up. In patients with poor ventricular function or associated problems that make standard techniques hazardous, bypassing only the LAD artery seems to be an acceptable approach, but only if circumflex disease is nongraftable. In those, we preferred not to revascularize poor-quality, thin, minor circumflex branches. Instead, we directly bypass the LAD system (and right coronary artery, if needed) using the off-pump technique, rather than taking the risk of CPB and aortic crossclamping, or pronouncing these patients unsuitable for surgical treatment. In such situations, off-pump surgery is performed with the aim to improve the patients' symptoms and life expectancy. Yet, a suboptimal result must be anticipated. Certainly, complete revascularization is essential in those that have graftable circumflex disease. It is preferable to completely revascularize as much as possible those patients with poor left ventricular function in the anticipation that there are islands of viable myocardium scattered in and around the areas of scar, trying to retrieve as much viable myocardium as possible (Lytle BW. Personal communication, 1996).
Associated disorders may possess risk-increasing effects for standard CPB. Bronchial asthma was found to be an important early predictor of mortality. On the other hand, patients with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and showing spirometric data below 50% of predicted could be referred for off-pump surgery, because the adverse effects of CPB in patients with limited pulmonary reserve were avoided. Similarly, in patients with chronic renal failure supported by dialysis or patients with carotid artery disease, off-pump coronary revascularization could be expected to be relatively less risky. Interestingly, hypertension was a predictor of early mortality. One can speculate that the increased left ventricular mass with limited coronary supply would poorly tolerate even the short periods of coronary blood flow interruption during the anastomosis. Until objective results are obtained to support this hypothesis, it must be kept in mind that hypertensive patients may have lesser tolerance for off-pump procedures. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was relatively low in patients treated off-pump, most probably because of liberal use of digitalis and ß-blocking agents in the perioperative period.
Another question may arise about our patient population. Off-pump surgery comprises about one third of our total CABG practice. In fact, our single-vessel CABG population is greater than those in the United States and other western countries. Most patients with single vessel (LAD) disease are referred for surgical revascularization by our cardiology department, because our institutional policy is not to supply surgical back-up for PTCA of proximal LAD lesions. The reasons for this are as follows: Although obstructive disease of the LAD system clearly has a poorer prognosis than that of the right or circumflex systems, the LAD system is the easiest with which to obtain the best operative results. In our opinion, current results support the approach that surgical revascularization with an internal thoracic artery graft for single-vessel disease involving the LAD yields a better long-term, event-free survival than continued medical treatment or PTCA and is the treatment of choice.
9-11 The periprocedural myocardial infarction rate in PTCA may reach 5.6%.
12 Furthermore, restenosis remains the Achilles heel of PTCA, and a restenosis rate of 45.4% has been reported in LAD lesions.
13 In single vessel disease, 5-year survival was found to be 100% for CABG and 96.5% for PTCA.
9 In the same study, 5-year event-free survival was 100% for CABG and only 52.2% for PTCA (p < 0.01).
Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) procedures are of increasing interest today. A standard median sternotomy, rather than a minithoracotomy, may be preferable for precise harvesting of the internal thoracic artery. With the minithoracotomy techniques, harvesting the internal thoracic artery may be difficult and cumbersome. Damage to this invaluable graft resulting from excess manipulation may decrease the efficiency of the procedure. Furthermore, with a limited thoracotomy technique, the distal muscular part of the internal thoracic artery, which is of poor quality to be a bypass conduit, is used. Undivided proximal branches may cause steal phenomena as well. Often, the anastomosis is done at a very distal part of LAD, leaving a large area of myocardium perfused retrogradely. Ischemic preconditioning is another popular issue. Occluding the coronary vessel to be grafted for 3 to 5 minutes before anastomosis has recently been advocated by some surgeons. However, the distal anastomosis itself generally takes about 5 to 7 minutes to construct, so we think such an attempt is unnecessary. Intraluminal shunts, adjunctive adenosine, other sophisticated immobilizing or hemostatic devices (Octopus [Utrecth, The Netherlands], USCI [Bard USCI Div., Billerica, Mass.], CTS [CTS Microelectronics, Inc., West Lafayette, Ind.]) are subjects of great enthusiasm and interest today. However, we are confident of the technique described herein. It is cheap and easily applicable.
In technically suitable cases, which consist of those with a graftable LAD artery and without circumflex system disease, off-pump CABG could be considered a safe and efficient technique. It is not only practical and economical, but also useful if cannulation, hypothermia, or CPB is associated with a major risk. Economic advantages should also be kept in mind in developing countries. However, the procedure is technically demanding, limiting its use as a universally reproducible procedure. Patient selection and surgical experience are of pivotal importance and long-term results are yet to be determined. Randomized trials with the early assessment of graft patency by control angiograms or noninvasive methods (such as thermal imaging or transthoracic duplex scanning) are absolutely necessary. An analysis of long-term results with symptomatologic, angiographic, and clinical outcomes with actuarial, symptom-free, and event-free survival analyses is the subject of an ongoing study in our institution. We believe that, despite its limitations, this technique will become more and more important in the future with its potential advantages. Besides, many invaluable lessons can be learned from the experience with the off-pump technique, and this experience may be the first step of future MIDCAB procedures.
| Appendix |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Normal wall motion: 1 point
Hypokinesia: 2 points
Akinesia: 3 points
Dyskinesia: 4 points
Aneurysm: 5 points
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Mannam, L. R Sajja, S. B. Dandu, S. N Pathuri, K. V. Saikiran, and S. Sompalli Off-Pump Coronary Revascularization for Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2008; 16(6): 473 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Hernandez Jr, J. R. Brown, D. S. Likosky, R. A. Clough, A. L. Hess, R. M. Roth, C. S. Ross, C. M. Whited, G. T. O'Connor, and J. D. Klemperer Neurocognitive Outcomes of Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2007; 84(6): 1897 - 1903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Mazzei, G. Nasso, G. Salamone, F. Castorino, A. Tommasini, and A. Anselmi Prospective Randomized Comparison of Coronary Bypass Grafting With Minimal Extracorporeal Circulation System (MECC) Versus Off-Pump Coronary Surgery Circulation, October 16, 2007; 116(16): 1761 - 1767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Palmer, M. A. Herbert, S. L. Prince, J. L. Williams, M. J. Magee, P. Brown, M. Katz, and M. J. Mack Coronary Artery Revascularization (CARE) Registry: An Observational Study of On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Revascularization Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 986 - 992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Vural, Z. H. Iscan, A. Kunt, E. Sener, and O. Tasdemir Off-Pump, In Situ Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting: A Durable Treatment for Single-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 79(3): 814 - 818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-F. Legare, K. J. Buth, and G. M. Hirsch Conversion to on pump from OPCAB is associated with increased mortality: results from a randomized controlled trial Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 27(2): 296 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Farhat, S. Aubert, P. Blanc, and O. Jegaden Totally endoscopic off-pump bilateral internal thoracic artery bypass grafting Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2004; 26(4): 845 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wippermann, J. M. Albes, R. Bruhin, M. Hartrumpf, R. Vollandt, H. Kosmehl, and T. Wahlers Chronic ultrastructural effects of temporary intraluminal shunts in a porcine off-pump model Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2004; 78(2): 543 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Carrel, L. Englberger, D. Keller, S. Windecker, B. Meier, and F. Eckstein Clinical and angiographic results after mechanical connection for distal anastomosis in coronary surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2004; 127(6): 1632 - 1640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Carrel, F. S. Eckstein, L. Englberger, P. A. Berdat, and J. Schmidli Clinical experience with devices for facilitated anastomoses in coronary artery bypass surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 77(3): 1110 - 1120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-G. Chassot, P. van der Linden, M. Zaugg, X. M. Mueller, and D. R. Spahn Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: physiology and anaesthetic management{dagger} Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2004; 92(3): 400 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-F. Legare, K. J. Buth, S. King, J. Wood, J. A. Sullivan, C. H. Friesen, J. Lee, K. Stewart, and G. M. Hirsch Coronary Bypass Surgery Performed off Pump Does Not Result in Lower In-Hospital Morbidity Than Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Performed on Pump Circulation, February 24, 2004; 109(7): 887 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R A Archbold and N P Curzen Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation Heart, October 1, 2003; 89(10): 1134 - 1137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Beauford, D. J. Goldstein, F. F. Sardari, R. Karanam, B. Luk, T. W. Prendergast, P. G. Burns, P. Garland, C. Chen, O. Patafio, et al. Multivessel off-pump revascularization in octogenarians: early and midterm outcomes Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 76(1): 12 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Xia, P. Herijgers, T. Nishida, S. Ozaki, P. Wouters, and W. Flameng Remote preconditioning lessens the deterioration of pulmonary function after repeated coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion in sheep: Un preconditionnement eloigne diminue la deterioration de la fonction pulmonaire apres l'occlusion et la reperfusion repetees de l'artere coronaire Can J Anesth, May 1, 2003; 50(5): 481 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ascione, M. Caputo, and G. D. Angelini Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: not a flash in the pan Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2003; 75(1): 306 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Cartier, M. Leacche, and P. Couture Changing pattern in beating heart operations: use of skeletonized internal thoracic artery Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2002; 74(5): 1548 - 1552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Torracca, J. J. Schreuder, A. Quarti, G. Ismeno, V. Franze, and O. Alfieri Acute effects of beating heart coronary surgery on left ventricular performance Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2002; 74(4): S1348 - 1352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Couture, A. Denault, P. Limoges, P. Sheridan, D. Babin, and R. Cartier Mechanisms of hemodynamic changes during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: [Les mecanismes de changements hemodynamiques pendant le pontage aortocoronarien a coeur battant] Can J Anesth, October 1, 2002; 49(8): 835 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Meyns, R. Autschbach, A. Boning, W. Konertz, K. Matschke, F. Schondube, K. Wiebe, and E. Fischer Coronary artery bypass grafting supported with intracardiac microaxial pumps versus normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective randomized trial Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2002; 22(1): 112 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Vassiliades Jr, J. L. Nielsen, and J. L. Lonquist Hemodynamic collapse during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2002; 73(6): 1874 - 1879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yeatman, M. Caputo, P. Narayan, A. Kumar Ghosh, R. Ascione, I. Ryder, and G. D. Angelini Intracoronary shunts reduce transient intraoperative myocardial dysfunction during off-pump coronary operations Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2002; 73(5): 1411 - 1417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J O'Gara, V. Natarajan, K. Lilly, A. Husain, O. M Shapira, and R. J Shemin Clinical outcomes of on-pump coronary bypass using heparin-bonded circuits and reduced anti-coagulation compare favorably with off-pump approach Perfusion, March 1, 2002; 17(2): 91 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. S. Meharwal, A. Mishra, and N. Trehan Safety and efficacy of one stage off-pump coronary artery operation and carotid endarterectomy Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2002; 73(3): 793 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Anyanwu, S. Al-Ruzzeh, S. J. George, R. Patel, M. H. Yacoub, and M. Amrani Conversion to off-pump coronary bypass without increased morbidity or change in practice Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2002; 73(3): 798 - 802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Muraki, C. D. Morris, J. M. Budde, R. N. Otto, Z.-Q. Zhao, J. D. Puskas, R. A. Guyton, and J. Vinten-Johansen Preserved myocardial blood flow and oxygen supply-demand balance with active coronary perfusion during simulated off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2002; 123(1): 53 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Corbineau, J.-P. Verhoye, T. Langanay, P. Menestret, and A. Leguerrier Feasibility of the utilisation of the right internal thoracic artery in the transverse sinus in off pump coronary revascularisation: early angiographic results Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2001; 20(5): 918 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.B.M. Gerritsen, W.J.P. van Boven, A.H.G. Driessen, F.J.L.M. Haas, and L.P.H.J. Aarts Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: oxidative stress and renal function Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2001; 20(5): 923 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Gersbach, C. Imsand, L. K. von Segesser, A. Delabays, P. Vogt, and F. Stumpe Beating heart coronary artery surgery: is sternotomy a suitable alternative to minimal invasive technique? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2001; 20(4): 760 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Dewey, M. J. Magee, J. R. Edgerton, M. Mathison, D. Tennison, and M. J. Mack Off-pump bypass grafting is safe in patients with left main coronary disease Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2001; 72(3): 788 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Calafiore, M. Di Mauro, M. Contini, G. Di Giammarco, M. Pano, G. Vitolla, A. Bivona, R. Carella, and S. D'Alessandro Myocardial revascularization with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in multivessel disease: impact of the strategy on early outcome Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2001; 72(2): 456 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yeatman, M. Caputo, R. Ascione, F. Ciulli, and G. D. Angelini Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery for critical left main stem disease: safety, efficacy and outcome Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2001; 19(3): 239 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Muraki, C. D. Morris, J. M. Budde, D. A. Velez, Z.-Q. Zhao, R. A. Guyton, and J. Vinten-Johansen Experimental off-pump coronary artery revascularization with adenosine-enhanced reperfusion J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2001; 121(3): 570 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|