|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:375-382
© 1999 Mosby, Inc.
CARDIOPULMONARY SUPPORT AND PHYSIOLOGY |
From the Department of Cardiac Surgery and the Anesthesiology/ Critical Care Medicine Laboratory, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants HL-52589 (F.X.M.) and HL46207 (P.J.D.).
Read at the Seventy-eighth Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Boston, Mass, May 3-6, 1998.
Received for publication May 8, 1998. Revisions requested July 7, 1998. Revisions received Aug 20, 1998. Accepted for publication Sept 14, 1998. Address for reprints: Francis X. McGowan, Jr, MD, Cardiac Anesthesia Service, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and interleukin-1 ß production, (2) lung tissue myeloperoxidase activity, and (3) myocardial inducible nitric oxide synthase activity. Indices of systolic and diastolic myocardial function were measured in Langendorff-perfused hearts.| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Phosphodiesterase inhibitors, such as amrinone and milrinone, have been used for their inotropic and vasodilating properties to treat heart failure. Recently, diverse immunomodulating properties have been attributed to various members of this family of compounds, including decreased myocardial inflammation and T-cell activity in experimental myocarditis
5-7 and decreased proinflammatory cytokine production in both humans
8 and experimental models.
9-11 These results and reports that increased cytokine production occurs in human heart failure
12 have led to speculation that the anti-inflammatory actions of these compounds may be responsible for the clinical improvements in cardiac function that have been observed at concentrations that are not inotropic.
8 Thus the purpose of the present study was to test the hypothesis that 2 clinically used agents, amrinone and vesnarinone, would significantly reduce inflammatory signaling in a model of severe systemic inflammatory response produced by intravenous endotoxin administration.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental protocol
Animal procedures received institutional approval and were conducted in conformity with the "Guiding Principles in the Care and Use of Animals" of the American Physiology Society and the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised, 1985). New Zealand White rabbits (2.5-3.0 kg) were given either intravenous endotoxin (0.2 mg/kg) dissolved in 1 mL/kg sterile saline solution (lipopolysaccharide-treated group) or sterile saline solution alone (1 mL/kg; control group). Two other groups received either intravenous vesnarinone (3 mg/kg as a single bolus) or amrinone (1 mg/kg bolus plus 10 µg/ kg/min continuous infusion) concomitant with the lipopolysaccharide infusion. Mean arterial blood pressure was recorded continuously from an indwelling catheter in an ear artery. Hearts from animals thus treated were either used for contractility studies or prepared for measurements of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activity. All animals received intravenous lactated Ringer's solution at a rate of 10 mL/kg/h for the duration of study.
Clinical effects of endotoxemia
Temperature (tympanic membrane) and clinical appearance were assessed hourly. Animals were given a behavioral lethargy score by an observer, blinded to treatment status, as follows: 0 = normal activity; 1 = quiet, spontaneous activity; 2 = no spontaneous movement, but responsive (withdrawal) to touch; 3 = responds only to noxious stimuli; 4 = unresponsive to noxious stimuli.
Plasma tumor necrosis factor-
and interleukin-1 ß concentrations
Approximately 1 mL of arterial blood was collected from at 0, 1, 2, and 6 hours. The blood was rapidly centrifuged (3000 g for 5 min at 4°C) and frozen at 80°C. Plasma tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF-
) concentrations were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with polygonal goat anti-rabbit TNF capture antibody (4-8 µg/mL), biotin-conjugated goat anti-rabbit TNF detection antibody (2 µg/mL), and streptavidin horseradish peroxidase conjugate (all from Pharmingen, San Diego, Calif) as per the manufacturer's instructions. TNF from activated rabbit peritoneal macrophages (Pharmingen) was used as standard. The lower limit of detection was 10 pg/mL; the assay was linear between 25 to 2000 pg/mL; the assay coefficient of variation was 9%. Plasma interleukin-1ß (IL-1 ß) was measured with a commercially available solid-phase ELISA according to the manufacturer's instructions (Biotrak, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, England). The IL-1ß assay was linear between 15 and 1000 pg/mL, with a lower limit of detection of 10 pg/mL and assay a coefficient of variation of 6%.
Pulmonary inflammation
Samples of lung tissue were rapidly excised, rinsed free of blood in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline solution, and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Lung myeloperoxidase activity was measured as previously described.
13 Lung tissue (approximately 5 g) was homogenized and then briefly sonicated in 50 mmol/L potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) containing 0.5% hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide. After centrifugation at 5000 g at 4°C for 10 minutes, the supernatant (0.1 mL) was mixed with 2.9 mL of potassium phosphate buffer containing 0.167 mg/mL o-dianisidine dihydrochloride and 0.0005% hydrogen peroxide. The reaction occurred at room temperature with the absorbance change measured at 460 nm over 3 minutes. One unit of myeloperoxidase activity was defined as that degrading 1 µmol peroxide per minute.
Isolated heart preparation
Six hours after lipopolysaccharide, lipopolysaccharide + vesnarinone, or lipopolysaccharide + amrinone, animals received ketamine, xylazine, and heparin (1000 units) intravenously; their hearts were then rapidly excised and placed in ice-cold Krebs-Henseleit buffer. The composition of the buffer was NaCl, 140 mmol/L; CaCl2, 1.25 mmol/L; KCl, 4.7 mmol/L; glucose, 11.0 mmol/L; MgSO4, 1.2 mmol/L; NaHC03, 25 mmol/L; NaH2PO4, 0.5 mmol/L; bovine regular insulin, 10 U/L, was also included. Hearts were then rapidly perfused retrograde through the aorta in the Langendorff mode at 80 mm Hg constant pressure with 37°C buffer that had been equilibrated with a 95% oxygen and 5% carbon dioxide gas mixture and passed through a 0.2-µm filter. The final buffer pH was 7.35 to 7.45; the PO2 was 500 to 600 mm Hg, and the PCO2 was 30 to 40 mm Hg. The pulmonary outflow tract was incised and cannulated. A latex fluid-filled balloon connected to a micromanometry catheter (Millar Instruments, Houston, Texas) was used for isovolumic left ventricular (LV) function measurements. The balloon was inserted into the left ventricle and sewn to the mitral anulus to prevent herniation; balloon volume was varied with a calibrated, fluid-filled syringe. Hearts were enclosed in a water-jacketed chamber; myocardial temperature was monitored continuously with a thermistor placed in the right ventricle and maintained between 36°C to 37°C.
Peak developed LV pressure and LV end-diastolic pressure were measured at 5 different LV balloon volumes. For the purposes of statistical comparison of diastolic function, pressure-volume data from each heart was entered into the equation P = bekv+c, as described by Glantz and Parmely,
14 which we have used previously.
15 Alterations in compliance were assessed as (1) chamber stiffness, calculated from the slope of this relationship as dP/dV at end-diastolic pressure (EDP) = 10 cm H2O, and (2) chamber volume, estimated from the balloon volume necessary at EDP = 0 (
V0). Coronary flow was measured by timed collection of the coronary effluent. Oxygen content was calculated from the measured oxygen tension (ABL-3 Acid-Base Laboratory, Radiometer, A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark) of aortic perfusate and coronary venous effluent samples; myocardial oxygen consumption was calculated as the measured arteriovenous oxygen difference multiplied by coronary flow.
iNOS activity
Calcium-independent nitric oxide enzyme activity (corresponding to iNOS, a key enzyme induced by proinflammatory cytokine signaling) was determined in the crude cytosolic fraction of LV myocardium by the conversion of radiolabeled arginine to citrulline, as we have previously described.
16 Hearts were rapidly isolated and flushed with ice-cold homogenization buffer, which was comprised of 25 mmol/L Tris HCl, 2 mmol/L EGTA, 2 mmol/L EDTA, 2 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 25 µg/mL leupeptin, and 0.3 mol/L sucrose, pH 7.5; the hearts were then snap frozen in liquid nitrogen.
Approximately 2 g of left ventricular myocardium was homogenized at 4°C with a polytron homogenizer and centrifuged at 1000 g for 10 minutes. The supernatant was then centrifuged at 100,000g for 1 hour at 4°C. The supernatant was saved as crude cytosol. The reaction buffer consisted of 20 mmol/L N-tris[hydroxymethyl]methyl-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid, 2 mmol/L dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol, and the aforementioned protease inhibitors. This was supplemented with 5 mmol/L tetrahydrobiopterin, 5 µmol/L flavin mononucleotide, 2.5 mmol/L NADPH, 25 mmol/L L-arginine, 1.0 mmol/L EGTA, 50 mmol/L valine (to inhibit arginase activity), and [2,3,4,53 H]-L-arginine hydrochloride (final specific activity 0.1 mCi/mL). The reaction was initiated by the addition of crude cytosol (in a 1:1 ratio of cytosol/reaction mixture), proceeded for 1 hour at room temperature, and was terminated by the addition of 20 mmol/L citric acid, pH 4.0, in a ratio of 4:1 (citric acid/reaction mixture). Arginine was separated from citrulline by slowly passing the samples over a cation exchange column (Polypore Sulfoprophy1 10 µm, 2.1 x 30 mm; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif) for 8 minutes; citrulline was eluted with 0.02 mmol/L citric acid, pH. 2.0. Enzyme activity was expressed as picomoles of arginine converted to citrulline per hour per milligram of protein.
Protein content was measured by the bicinchonic acid method (Pierce, Rockford, Ill) with bovine serum albumin used as standard.
Statistical analyses
All data are presented as mean ± SD. Differences in mortality rates between groups were compared with 2 x 2 contingency tables and Fisher's exact test (2-tailed). Multiple group comparisons were made with the Kruskal-Wallis test or analysis of variance followed by the Bonferroni procedure. For the purposes of statistical analysis, cytokine concentrations of 10 pg/mL or less (the lower limit of detection of the ELISA) were given a value of 0 pg/mL.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Serum bicarbonate was consistently lower in lipopolysaccharide-treated animals beginning 1 to 2 hours after lipopolysaccharide administration. The nadir value was 10 ± 1 mmol/L (vs 21 ± 2 mmol/L in control animals; P = .02). This abnormality was corrected somewhat by amrinone (14 ± 3 mmol/L) and more so by vesnarinone (18 ± 2; P = .05 vs lipopolysaccharide alone).
Markers of inflammatory activation
The effects of the different treatments on plasma TNF-
and IL-1 ß in endotoxemic animals are shown in Fig l, A and B, respectively.
Lipopolysaccharide significantly increased lung myeloperoxidase activity 6 hours after exposure; this change was prevented by vesnarinone but not by amrinone (Fig. 2).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The most important finding of this study was that vesnarinone and amrinone, to somewhat different degrees, prevented or reduced many different features of the acute endotoxemic response. These included lipopolysaccharide-induced death, fever, acidosis, cardiac dysfunction, and elevated plasma cytokine concentrations. Because vesnarinone has unique pharmacologic effects unrelated to type III phosphodiesterase inhibition, including Na+ channel opening, decreased inward and outward K+ currents, and prolonged action potential duration in the heart,
18-20 we studied the effects of amrinone in the same model. Previous studies have demonstrated varying potency of type III and IV phosphodiesterase inhibitors to decrease production of cytokines and other markers of inflammation in response to proinflammatory stimuli.
21-23 The exact mechanism of action is uncertain but is likely to include increased intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) concentrations
9; for example, increased cAMP blocks lipopolysaccharide-mediated TNF gene transcription.
9,22-24 This effect may be specific for TNF, however, because increased cAMP does not prevent production of IL-6 under similar circumstances.
22 Furthermore, vesnarinone but not amrinone prevented natural killer cell activity and TNF-
production in a murine model of acute viral myocarditis,
6 which also suggests that some of vesnarinone's anti-inflammatory effects may not be common to all phosphodiesterase inhibitors.
Other reports have documented inhibition of second messenger signaling in response to proinflammatory and membrane-damaging stimuli, particularly by means of phosphatidic acid release from membrane lipids.
25,26 The ability to prevent "stress-induced" cellular activation in response to the activation of specific membrane receptors or membrane damage may underlie the wide range of effects on cytokine production, neutrophil activation, and organ function. Because the primary role of phosphatidic acid signaling appears to be to respond to various forms of cellular stress, its inhibition may preferentially target cells exposed to activating events while minimally affecting normal cells; this may offer a potential advantage compared with other agents such as corticosteroids.
25
There were some important differences between amrinone and vesnarinone in this model. Amrinone demonstrated a minimal ability to decrease pulmonary leukocyte infiltration as measured by lung myeloperoxidase activity. Whether this was due to less potent effects on leukocyte signaling mechanisms (eg, IL-8, adhesion molecule production) or other mechanisms requires further delineation. Intriguing was the suggestion that vesnarinone had greater effect on fever and "sickness behavior" despite equivalent effects on systemic cytokine concentrations. Fever and behavioral changes caused by lipopolysaccharide can be attributed to specific areas within the central nervous system.
27 Endotoxemia and cytokines are believed to affect the brain indirectly by stimulating meningeal macrophages and perivascular microglia to produce prostaglandins and other signaling compounds
27; whether vesnarinone has greater inhibitory effect on these pathways remains to be determined. However, it should also be emphasized that plasma (or brain) vesnarinone and amrinone concentrations were not measured and dose-response effects not studied. Important differences exist in different cell types with regard to phosphodiesterase isoform content (eg, phosphodiesterase III or IV) and the sensitivity of these isoforms to phosphodiesterase inhibitors. For example, vesnarinone may display some degree of selectivity for the cardiac phosphodiesterase III isoform, inhibiting neutrophil and monocyte phosphodiesterase IV at significantly higher concentrations.
28 Thus pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic explanations for any observed differences between the 2 drugs cannot be excluded.
The significance of the present study is that it suggests that agents such as vesnarinone or amrinone may be useful to modulate several aspects of the inflammatory response. Although vesnarinone has been found to improve myocardial performance in patients with heart failure, prolonged use of high-dose oral vesnarinone increased mortality rates.
20 The responsible mechanisms were uncertain, but it is unlikely that a similar result would occur given the much shorter duration (12-24 hours) of therapy that would be needed in the setting of CPB. It is likely, however, that this intervention would need to be combined with agents affecting other pathways for optimal effects.
| Appendix: Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Do you think that ischemia-reperfusion would precipitate similar responses or is this more consistent with an inflammatory stimuli like TNF or IL-1 or lipopolysaccharide? Have you done any studies where the event occurs and then you give vesnarinone and then look at some of the markers of inflammation? Can you give it later or does this have to be something that is on board before?
Dr Takeuchi. I think I will try to answer the second question first. We tried vesnarinone treatment after a couple of hours after injection of lipopolysaccharide, but the effect we got was not so dramatic, so that is why we administered the vesnarinone simultaneously. Regarding your first question, I think that the next model to study probably is the CPB model. We just focused on this simple, severe model to test the effect of this drug, to see if it is effective or not; so the results are actually positive. I think the next step will be to try to do the CPB model.
Dr del Nido. I would like to add a comment to what Dr Takeuchi said. In fact, what we are trying to address here is the inflammatory response to CPB. The interesting finding is that if you treat, in essence almost pretreat, or treat simultaneously, you get a profound reduction in the inflammatory response. We were accustomed to using these drugs as inotropes after ischemia. They do have some effect in improving function after ischemia, obviously, but there may be a role for them as a pretreatment modality. Dr Verrier. Is there a disadvantage to treating somebody with it before bypass? Have you done the model in bypass at all?
Dr del Nido. We have not done the model in bypass. The disadvantage is the vasodilatory properties of amrinone. Vesnarinone is certainly not as potent for that. So probably vesnarinone would be the better drug to test.
Dr Christopher A. Caldarone (Boston, Mass). In relation to the reperfusion question, working in Dr Levitsky's laboratory in Boston, we actually investigated milrinone in a large animal model of ischemia-reperfusion injury (Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:540-5). Surprisingly, in the nonischemic controls, we were not able to detect evidence of improved contractility or diastolic function in the absence of an ischemic injury.
After an ischemia-reperfusion injury with global normothermic ischemia, administration of milrinone in the reperfusion period actually had only a moderate improvement in contractility but a very dramatic improvement in early diastolic relaxation. Our impression was that the efficacy of phosphodiesterase inhibition was somehow limited to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Your data would suggest that we should reinterpret our results and perhaps what we were really seeing was an amelioration of an inflammatory response after the reperfusion injury.
My one question is that the end-diastolic pressure/volume relationship tends to be a better index of the extent of late diastolic relaxation. In contrast, early diastolic relaxation is commonly estimated with tau, the constant of isovolumic relaxation, which more accurately reflects calcium handling events occurring in early diastole. Did you find a difference in the early diastolic function?
Dr Takeuchi. Actually I did measure diastolic pressure/ volume in these groups, but there was no difference between those groups. In terms of the diastolic constant tau, it is significantly different.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production, by phosphodiesterase inhibitors. J Pharmacol Exp Therap 1996;279:247-54. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. M. Tsai, M. W. Turrentine, B. C. Sheridan, M. Wang, A. C. Fiore, J. W. Brown, and D. R. Meldrum Differential Effects of Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors on Hypoxic Pulmonary Vasoconstriction and Pulmonary Artery Cytokine Expression Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2006; 81(1): 272 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G Raja and G. D Dreyfus Modulation of Systemic Inflammatory Response after Cardiac Surgery Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2005; 13(4): 382 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Chong, C. R. Hampton, and E. D. Verrier Microvascular Inflammatory Response in Cardiac Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2003; 7(3): 333 - 354. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. K. Chanani, D. B. Cowan, K. Takeuchi, D. N. Poutias, L. M. Garcia, P. J. del Nido, and F. X. McGowan Jr Differential Effects of Amrinone and Milrinone Upon Myocardial Inflammatory Signaling Circulation, September 24, 2002; 106(12_suppl_1): I-284 - I-289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Paparella, T.M. Yau, and E. Young Cardiopulmonary bypass induced inflammation: pathophysiology and treatment. An update Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 21(2): 232 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Manna and B. B. Aggarwal Vesnarinone Suppresses TNF-Induced Activation of NF-{kappa}B, c-Jun Kinase, and Apoptosis J. Immunol., June 1, 2000; 164(11): 5815 - 5825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |