|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:148-154
© 2000 Mosby, Inc.
CARDIOPULMONARY SUPPORT AND PHYSIOLOGY |
From the Bristol Heart Institutea and Department of Anaesthesia,b University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom.
This work was supported by the Sir Siegmund Warburgs Voluntary Settlement Fund and the British Heart Foundation.
Address for reprints: Gianni D. Angelini, FRCS, Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW, United Kingdom (E-mail: G.D.Angelini{at}bristol.ac.uk).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A number of biochemical markers have been suggested in an attempt to quantify the neuronal injury at the time of insult, among them protein S-100. This is an acidic, calcium-binding protein found in high concentrations in glial and Schwann cells.
11 The appearance of this protein in serum indicates both neuronal damage and increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier.
Recently, interest in coronary revascularization on the beating heart has been revived, with the suggestion that avoidance of CPB may reduce neuropsychologic damage. There are, however, no data available as part of a prospective randomized trial on the possible relation between a recognized marker of ischemic brain injury such as protein S-100 and neuropsychologic outcome in patients undergoing elective CABG with or without CPB.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anesthetic technique
Anesthetic technique was standardized for all patients. This consisted of propofol infusion at 3 mg · kg1 · h1 combined with remifentanil infusion at 0.5 to 1 µg · kg1 · min1. Neuromuscular blockade was achieved with 0.1 to 0.15 mg · kg1 of pancuronium or vecuronium and the lungs were ventilated to normocapnia with 45% to 50% oxygen in nitrogen. Propofol and remifentanil infusions were maintained throughout the operation. In the on-pump group, metaraminol or phentolamine was used as required to maintain the systemic pressure between 50 and 60 mm Hg. In the off-pump group, a mean arterial pressure of 60 mm Hg or above was maintained with metaraminol or fluids as indicated by the hemodynamic condition. Esmolol was used as necessary to maintain the heart rate less than 65 beats/min.
Heparin and protamine management
In the on-pump group, heparin was given at a dose of 300 IU · kg1 to achieve a target activated clotting time (ACT) of 480 seconds or above before the start of CPB. In the off-pump group, a heparin dose of 100 IU · kg1 was given before the start of the first anastomosis. The target ACT in this group was between 250 and 350 seconds. Protamine was used at the end to reverse the effect of heparin and return the ACT to preoperative levels.
Surgical technique
On-pump group
CPB was instituted by means of ascending aortic cannulation and a 2-stage venous cannulation via the right atrium. A standard CPB circuit was used consisting of a Bard tubing set (C. R. Bard, Inc, Santa Ana, Calif), which included a 40-µm filter, a Stöckert roller pump (Sorin Biomedica, Midhurst, United Kingdom), and a hollow-fiber membrane oxygenator (Monolyth, Sorin Biomedica, Midhurst, United Kingdom). The extracorporeal circuit was primed with 1000 mL of Hartmann solution, 500 mL of gelofusine, a 0.5 g · kg1 concentration of mannitol, 7 mL of 10% calcium gluconate, and 60 mg of heparin. Nonpulsatile flow was used. The flow rate throughout bypass was 2.4 L · m2 · min1. Systemic temperature was allowed to vary between 32°C and 34°C. Myocardial protection was achieved by means of intermittent antegrade warm blood cardioplegia as described by Calafiore and associates.
12
Once all distal anastomoses had been completed, the aortic crossclamp was removed and the proximal anastomosis was carried out with partial clamping of the aorta.
Off-pump group
The method of exposure and stabilization used to carry out the distal anastomoses was a combination of the technique previously described by our group
13 and the use of the CTS retractor (CardioThoracic Systems, Cupertino, Calif).
14 The target vessel was exposed and snared above the chosen point for anastomosis by means of a 4-0 Prolene polypropylene suture (Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ) with a soft piece of plastic "snugger" to prevent coronary injury. The coronary artery was then opened and the anastomosis performed with a continuous suture. Visualization was enhanced by a surgical blower-humidifier device (model SSVW-002; Surgical Site Visualization Wand; Research Medical Inc, Midvale, Utah) with a
-inch polyvinyl chloride gas line and fluid administration set connected to a regulated gas source of medical air. An intracoronary shunt (Anastoflo Intravascular Shunt; Research Medical Inc) was used only if there was appreciable electrocardiographic or hemodynamic instability or excessive bleeding during the construction of the anastomosis.
Samples for serum S-100 protein analysis
Blood samples (4 mL) were collected from the central venous pressure line at induction of anesthesia, 30 minutes after cessation of CPB in the on-pump group or 30 minutes after completion of all anastomoses in the off-pump group, and 4, 12, and 24 hours after the operation. The samples were centrifuged within an hour of collection to separate the serum, which was frozen and stored at 20°C.
S-100 protein assay
The S-100 immunoradiometric assay (Sangtec 100; Sangtec Medical AB, Bromma, Sweden) is a monoclonal 2-site immunoradiometric (sandwich) assay. The method discriminates between the
-subunit and ß-subunit (ß-S-100 is present in high concentration in glial cells and Schwann cells) and measures the ß-subunit of the S-100 protein as defined by the 3 monoclonal antibodies SMST 12, SMSK 25, and SMSK 28. All samples were independently analyzed by Cambridge Life Sciences, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Clinical and neuropsychologic assessment
The preoperative assessment included all of the usual clinical and investigation measures. The general level of risk for cardiac operations was expressed in terms of the New York Heart Association classification and Parsonnets operative risk stratification.
15 Postoperative neurologic status was assessed daily by clinical examination until the patient was discharged from the hospital. The patients neurologic and neuropsychologic state was assessed a few days before the operation, to provide accurate baseline information, and 12 weeks after the operation. A suitably qualified and trained examiner, blinded to the surgical treatment, carried out the tests in a standardized manner. In accordance with the "Statement of Consensus on Assessment of Neurobehavioral Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery,"
16 we subjected the patients to a battery of core tests that covered memory, language, psychomotor speed, attention, and concentration. This consisted initially of 2 tests from the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) and a battery of 5 neuropsychologic tests taken from the revised Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS).
17 These are accepted tests of global cognitive function. The tests were presented in a fixed order according to conventional practice, and the scores were arranged such that larger scores indicated better neuropsychologic performance.
In addition, because cognitive function may be influenced by mood,
16 each patients current mental health was assessed by means of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30)
18 and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD).
19
Statistical methods
As in our groups work in this area,
17 the principal outcome measure of change in cognitive function for each patient was the number of neuropsychologic tests showing deterioration between baseline and the assessment 12 weeks after the operation. The numbers recruited were based on the requirement for 90% power to detect a difference of 1.18 scores, with an alpha error set at 0.05. This was the same difference that we saw in our previous study
17 between patients who received CPB perfusion at 32°C and those who received it at 37°C. The difference in this measure between on-pump and off-pump groups was examined in a single variable model by means of the Student t test and in a multivariable model to examine for the effects of any documented confounders. A stepwise multiple regression was undertaken, offering age, the changes in scores for Hospital Anxiety and Hospital Depression in the General Health Questionnaire, and the treatment (on pump or off pump) as explanators. This analysis, which examined only the direction of change without taking into account the magnitude, was supported by a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), using a general linear model and offering age and the scores for Hospital Anxiety and Hospital Depression as possible confounders.
For effects on S-100 protein over time, the prospectively planned analysis was a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), applied to the data from the 4 collection times after the preoperative sample. This was to examine for effects of time, group, and group-time interaction. When the data were obtained, the concentration values at most of the measurement times were not normally distributed, so that the probability estimates from the ANOVA were potentially unreliable. For supporting analyses, the area under the concentration curve (AUC) from the second sample time was calculated by triangulation as a summary measure for each patient. This measure was not normally distributed. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to examine whether this measure varied between groups (on pump or off pump). Subsidiary Mann-Whitney testing was also undertaken on the concentrations at each sampling time. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to examine for variation with the primary outcome variable (number of deteriorations in neuropsychologic scores) and a Spearman rank correlation to examine for variation with age.
All descriptive statistics and inferential testing were carried out by means of procedures in StatView (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC) or Minitab 10.1 for Windows (Minitab Inc, State College, Pa).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
S-100 protein concentration
Fig 2 shows the distributions of S-100 protein concentrations in the 2 groups at the different sampling times, with "box and whisker" symbols used to indicate medians, interquartile ranges, and total ranges. The prospectively planned repeated-measures ANOVA identified a highly significant (P = .02) effect of group (on pump or off pump) and a very highly significant effect of time (P = .01) and group time interaction (P = .02) (ie, the difference between groups depended on the sampling time). Testing at individual sampling times with Bonferroni correction showed a highly significant difference (P = .01) at the 30-minute sampling time but not at subsequent sampling periods. The reliability of the P values is called into question by the skewedness of the data, as indicated inFig 2
. Analysis of residuals showed significant non-normality in their distribution about the ANOVA model, and this could not be usefully reduced by a simple logarithmic transformation. The suspect findings of the repeated-measures ANOVA were supported by the difference in AUC of the S-100 protein concentrations between the 2 treatment groups. The median AUC in the on-pump group was 3.14 µg · h1 · L1 with an interquartile range from 1.89 to 6.90, whereas in the off-pump group it was 2.19 with an interquartile range from 0.80 to 3.52 (Mann-Whitney test, P = .6). The Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney tests on the concentrations at each sampling time indicated that any difference in AUC was largely due to the difference in concentration at 30 minutes.Table IV shows the median AUCs and interquartile ranges in the groups characterized by number of neuropsychologic deteriorations. There was no obvious trend (Kruskal-Wallis test, P = .2). The very large AUC in 1 of the 3 patients with 5 score deteriorations was in a patient whose baseline S-100 concentrations were already high. The Spearman rank correlation for AUC with age was 0.507 (P = .05).
|
|
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Currently, serum S-100 protein is widely recognized as the most accurate biochemical marker of neuronal injury.
5,8,11 The most conservative, nonparametric analysis of the serum S-100 protein concentrations over time gave only 94% confidence that there was a bigger rise in the on-pump group. Even the apparently more discriminating but also more suspect repeated-measures ANOVA indicated that any such difference had been measured only at 30 minutes after the operation and had essentially disappeared by 4 hours. Even if the existence of a short-lasting difference in S-100 protein concentrations between the on-pump and off-pump groups is accepted, it is not necessarily attributable to the presence or absence of the pump. The randomization happened to produce a slight preponderance of relatively older patients in the on-pump group, and the AUC of the S-100 protein concentrations tended to increase with increasing age. Both the association with age and the rapid disappearance of elevated postperfusion concentrations of S-100 protein are in accordance with observations by other authors.
5,11,29 Westaby and associates
5 speculated that the elevations reflect diffuse microembolic cerebral injury together with increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier rather than irreversible cerebral damage through neuronal ischemia. Their studies show a correlation of S-100 protein not only with the duration of CPB but also with the presence of carotid artery stenoses.
8 The clearance of S-100 protein is reduced by reduction in glomerular filtration rate. This may be a plausible explanation for the transient rise in S-100 protein in the on-pump group, but further studies would need to confirm this. Our results may support the hypothesis that, at least in carefully selected, relatively young patients undergoing elective operations, with no previous history of neurologic injury, modern CPB causes only a transient loss of cerebral autoregulation with increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier resulting in temporary, functional rather than long-term, structural changes. It remains to be seen whether this is so in more elderly patients with pre-existing neurologic deficits.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. H. Moller, L. Penninga, J. Wetterslev, D. A. Steinbruchel, and C. Gluud Clinical outcomes in randomized trials of off- vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2008; 29(21): 2601 - 2616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Takagi, N. Kawai, and T. Umemoto Neurocognitive decline after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass. Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 86(2): 690 - 690. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Stroobant, G. van Nooten, D. De Bacquer, Y. Van Belleghem, and G. Vingerhoets Neuropsychological functioning 3-5 years after coronary artery bypass grafting: does the pump make a difference? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 34(2): 396 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Marasco, L. N. Sharwood, and M. J. Abramson No improvement in neurocognitive outcomes after off-pump versus on-pump coronary revascularisation: a meta-analysis Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 33(6): 961 - 970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G Raja and G. D Dreyfus Current Status of Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, April 1, 2008; 16(2): 164 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Dewey and M. J. Mack Myocardial Revascularization without Cardiopulmonary Bypass Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 633 - 654. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Takagi, T. Tanabashi, N. Kawai, and T. Umemoto Cognitive decline after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2007; 134(2): 512 - 513. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sedrakyan, A. W. Wu, A. Parashar, E. B. Bass, and T. Treasure Off-Pump Surgery Is Associated With Reduced Occurrence of Stroke and Other Morbidity as Compared With Traditional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis of Systematically Reviewed Trials * Supplemental Appendix I Stroke, November 1, 2006; 37(11): 2759 - 2769. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Vedin, H. Nyman, A. Ericsson, S. Hylander, and J. Vaage Cognitive function after on or off pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 30(2): 305 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Carrier, A. Denault, J. Lavoie, and L. P. Perrault Randomized controlled trial of pericardial blood processing with a cell-saving device on neurologic markers in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 82(1): 51 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. O. Jensen, P. Hughes, L. S. Rasmussen, P. U. Pedersen, and D. A. Steinbruchel Cognitive Outcomes in Elderly High-Risk Patients After Off-Pump Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized Trial Circulation, June 20, 2006; 113(24): 2790 - 2795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. N. Djaiani Aortic arch atheroma: stroke reduction in cardiac surgical patients. Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, June 1, 2006; 10(2): 143 - 157. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Ernest, M. U.C. Worcester, J. Tatoulis, P. C. Elliott, B. M. Murphy, R. O. Higgins, M. R. Le Grande, and A. J. Goble Neurocognitive Outcomes in Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Bypass Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 81(6): 2105 - 2114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sendelbach, R. Lindquist, S. Watanuki, and K. Savik Correlates of Neurocognitive Function of Patients After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Am. J. Crit. Care., May 1, 2006; 15(3): 290 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Rogers, G. D. Angelini, L. A. Culliford, R. Capoun, and R. Ascione Coronary surgery in patients with preexisting chronic atrial fibrillation: early and midterm clinical outcome. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 81(5): 1676 - 1682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ascione, A. Ghosh, B. C. Reeves, J. Arnold, M. Potts, A. Shah, and G. D. Angelini Retinal and Cerebral Microembolization During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Circulation, December 20, 2005; 112(25): 3833 - 3838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-J. Wang, H.-H. Wu, S.-Y. Fang, Y.-R. Yang, and A. C.-C. Tseng Serum S-100 {beta} Protein During Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery With or Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 80(4): 1371 - 1374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Alston Pumphead--or not! Does avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass for coronary artery bypass surgery result in less brain damage? Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2005; 94(6): 699 - 701. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Bainbridge, J. Martin, and D. Cheng Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2005; 9(1): 105 - 111. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pepper Controversies in Off-pump Coronary Artery Surgery Clin. Med. Res., February 1, 2005; 3(1): 27 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J Murphy, R. Ascione, and G. D Angelini Coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart: surgical revascularization for the next decade? Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2004; 25(23): 2077 - 2085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A Black, S. Ghosh, K. Sin, T. Spyt, and R. Pillai Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2004; 12(4): 379 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Committee Members, K. A. Eagle, R. A. Guyton, R. Davidoff, F. H. Edwards, G. A. Ewy, T. J. Gardner, J. C. Hart, H. C. Herrmann, L. D. Hillis, et al. ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Summary article: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2004; 44(5): 1146 - 1154. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Eagle, R. A. Guyton, R. Davidoff, F. H. Edwards, G. A. Ewy, T. J. Gardner, J. C. Hart, H. C. Herrmann, L. D. Hillis, A. M. Hutter Jr, et al. ACC/AHA 2004 Guideline Update for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery) Circulation, August 31, 2004; 110(9): 1168 - 1176. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Velissaris, A. T. M. Tang, M. Murray, R. L. Mehta, P. J. Wood, D. A. Hett, and S. K. Ohri A prospective randomized study to evaluate stress response during beating-heart and conventional coronary revascularization Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2004; 78(2): 506 - 512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. I. Hall Serum S-100{beta} protein and postoperative neurological dysfunction - ready for prime time?/La proteine serique S-100{beta} et la dysfonction neurologique postoperatoire - correlation prete pour une large diffusion? Can J Anesth, August 1, 2004; 51(7): 645 - 648. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ascione, B. C. Reeves, M. Pano, and G. D. Angelini Trainees operating on high-risk patients without cardiopulmonary bypass: a high-risk strategy? Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 78(1): 26 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J.M.G. van der Heijden, H. M. Nathoe, E. W.L. Jansen, and D. E. Grobbee Meta-analysis on the effect of off-pump coronary bypass surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 26(1): 81 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||