JTCS St. Jude Medical
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Millar, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by South, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Millar, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by South, M.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:192
© 2000 Mosby, Inc.


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Pulmonary surfactant and cardiopulmonary bypass in infants

Kenneth John Millar, MRCP, FRACP, Peter Anderson Dargaville, FRACP, Michael South, MD, FRACP

Intensive Care Unit, Department of Neonatology, Royal Children’s Hospital, Flemington Rd, Parkville, Victoria 3052
Melbourne, Australia

To the Editor:

We read with interest the recent article by Paul and colleaguesGo 1 describing changes in pulmonary surfactant after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in a group of infants having surgery for congenital heart disease.

In this article the authors report concentrations of phospholipid and, indirectly, protein in returned fluid from tracheal lavage. There is no apparent attempt to correct concentrations for variable recovery of epithelial lining fluid in these specimens. To define the concentration of surfactant components in sampled secretions, a marker of dilution should be used, allowing the result to be expressed as concentration in epithelial lining fluid.Go 2 Results expressed as concentrations in raw lavage fluid are impossible to interpret meaningfully.

Paul and colleagues do report the phospholipid/protein ratio of tracheal lavage specimens. This ratio does nothing to clarify the data and certainly cannot be interpreted as an attempt to correct for dilution, given their later statement that alveolar protein concentration is known to be increased after CPB. A useful marker of dilution of epithelial lining fluid must not be present in increased concentration in the damaged lung. For this reason protein (along with albumin and sphingomyelin) is not suitable in this population.Go 3

Paul and colleagues report a significant fall in total phospholipid concentration immediately after CPB. In their discussion they state: "Our data support the findings of McGowan and colleagues, who demonstrated an alteration in surfactant composition in older infants and children after CPB." In fact, these findings are at odds with those of McGowan and colleagues,Go 4 who found no difference in total phosphatidylcholine recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage before and after CPB. In the other published study looking at phospholipid after CPB in children, LeVine and colleaguesGo 5 showed no difference in phosphatidylcholine levels between a group of children who had undergone CPB and a control group. Both of these studies involved greater numbers of patients having CPB than in that of Paul and colleagues, and both are also subject to the same criticism of not appropriately correcting results for dilution.

There may well be significant abnormalities of pulmonary surfactant that contribute to postoperative lung dysfunction in this patient population. McGowan and colleaguesGo 4 did find a change in the proportion of phospholipid in pulmonary surfactant subtypes after CPB (a measurement not influenced by dilution of specimens), which would have important functional implications. This subject warrants further investigation, but care must be taken to express findings in a way that will add to our understanding of the consequences of CPB on the composition and function of pulmonary surfactant.

References

  1. Paul DA, Greenspan JS, Davis DA, Russo P, Antunes MJ. The role of cardiopulmonary bypass and surfactant in pulmonary decompensation after surgery for congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:1025-6.[Free Full Text]
  2. Reynolds HY. Bronchoalveolar lavage [review]. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;135:250-63.[Medline]
  3. Dargaville PA, South M, Vervaart P, McDougall PN. Validity of markers of dilution in small volume lung lavage. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. In press.
  4. McGowan FX Jr, Ikegami M, del Nido PJ, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass significantly reduces surfactant activity in children. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:968-77.[Abstract]
  5. LeVine AM, Lotze A, Stanley S, et al. Surfactant content in children with inflammatory lung disease [see comments]. Crit Care Med 1996;24:1062-7.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Millar, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by South, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Millar, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by South, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS