JTCS Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Shinichi Takamoto
Yutaka Kotsuka
Hiroshi Kubota
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ninomiya, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kubota, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ninomiya, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kubota, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Great vessels

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;123:371-372
© 2002 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Brief Communications

Stent-graft–induced intimal injury one year after surgery

Mikio Ninomiya, MD, Shinichi Takamoto, MD, Yutaka Kotsuka, MD, Hiroshi Kubota, MD Tokyo, Japan

From the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Received for publication July 12, 2001. Accepted for publication July 25, 2001. Address for reprints: Mikio Ninomiya, MD, 6-15-13-902 Hon-Komagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0021, Japan (E-mail: mikio-ninomiya{at}par.odn.ne.jp).



View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Dr Ninomiya

 
Intimal injury is a probable complication after stent-graft implantation. It is generally believed to occur more frequently during the perioperative rather than the late postoperative period and in cases of acute rather than chronic aortic dissections. We, however, encountered a case in which intimal injury occurred about 1 year after stent-graft implantation for chronic aortic dissection, and a surprisingly high incidence of such cases has recently been reported. We report this case as a word of caution.

Clinical summary
An 83-year-old woman who had been medically treated for a dilating type IIIb aortic dissection since 1993 began having chest pain and was referred to our hospital in December 1999. Computed tomography (CT) showed an acute type I aortic dissection extending to the root of the left subclavian artery with an intimal tear in the ascending aorta, and a separate chronic type IIIb dissection with a smooth and thickened intimal membrane, an intimal tear in the distal arch, and a maximal diameter of 50 mm. Considering the patient's age, we planned an emergency operation consisting of conventional ascending aortic replacement and surgical insertion of a stent graft to close the entry in the distal arch.

After median sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass was instituted between the left femoral artery and both of the venae cavae. With the use of deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest with retrograde cerebral perfusion, the distal ascending aorta was transected. The intimal tear in the distal arch was clearly visible, and a stent graft comprising a 30-mm woven Dacron graft and a 30 x 75-mm Z stent was smoothly inserted to cover the intimal tear. Because the stent graft was deployed slightly too proximally and partially covered the orifice of the left subclavian artery, the proximal portion of the graft was peeled off so as not to disturb the blood flow. The ascending aorta was then replaced with a 26-mm woven Dacron graft.

The postoperative course was uneventful. Angiograms 3 weeks postoperatively revealed no flow of contrast medium into the false lumen, and the distal portion of the stent seemed to fit well into a nearly straight portion of the descending aorta(Figure 1). Future problems in this area were not anticipated. In addition, CT repeated 3 weeks and 8 months postoperatively revealed expansion of the true lumen with concurrent shrinkage and thrombo-occlusion of the false lumen(Figure 2, A and B). However, to our surprise, follow-up CT conducted 14 months postoperatively revealed a new ulcer-like projection invading the thrombosed false lumen at the distal end of the stent graft(Figure 2Go, C and D). No apparent cause other than the continuous stress produced by the expansile force of the stent against the intimal membrane was noticed. Although the outer diameter of the descending aorta had not increased, we think additional endoluminal stent-graft placement may soon be necessary.



View larger version (223K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Aortogram conducted 3 weeks postoperatively revealed no endoleak leak, and the distal portion of the stent(arrow)fit well into the nearly straight portion of the descending aorta.

 


View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. CT conducted 3 weeks (A) and 8 months (B) postoperatively revealed shrinking false lumen in the descending aorta. CT conducted 14 months postoperatively (C) and its sagittal view (D), however, revealed a new ulcer-like projection(arrows)at the distal edge of the stent graft.

 
Discussion
Damaging the fragile intimal membrane by inserting a stent graft is generally believed to be the most probable cause of stent-graft–induced intimal injury. Therefore, intimal injury is believed to occur more frequently in cases of acute rather than chronic dissection, because intimal membranes are thinner and weaker in the acute phase. However, we think that once a stent graft is successfully placed, the thinner and softer intimal membrane in the acute phase will expand more easily to recover its original shape and that intimal injury is not likely to occur thereafter. Kato and associatesGo 1 indirectly supported this idea by reporting enhanced shrinkage of the false lumina without intimal injury in patients with dissection treated with stent grafts within 6 months after the onset. In addition, Dake and coworkersGo 2 reported no intimal injury after stent-graft implantation for 19 patients with acute dissection with an average follow-up period of 13 months. On the other hand, we think that a thickened intimal membrane in chronic dissection will not expand easily and that an intimal membrane at the border between the stented and the nonstented areas will be subject to stress produced by the expansile force of the stent for a long period, eventually leading to new intimal tears in some cases. Yamazaki and colleaguesGo 3 recently reported that as many as 18% of patients had new ulcer-like projections at the edges of stent grafts between 6 and 12 months postoperatively, as in our case. Although determining the incidence of such cases requires more data, one should keep in mind the rather high incidence of late intimal injury after stent-graft implantation for chronic aortic dissection. These patients should be followed up more closely after surgery because it is difficult to predict the onset of this type of intimal injury, which may lead to unexpected aortic rupture.

References

  1. Kato M, Matsuda T, Kaneko M, Kuratani T, Mizushima T, Seo Y, et al. Outcomes of stent-graft treatment of false lumen in aortic dissection. Circulation. 1998;98(Suppl):II-305-12.
  2. Dake MD, Kato N, Mitchell RS, Semba CP, Razavi MK, Shimono T, et al. Endovascular stent-graft placement for the treatment of acute aortic dissection. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1546-52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Yamazaki I, Imoto K, Suzuki S, Ichikawa Y, Karube N, Manabe T, et al. Midterm results of stent-graft repair for thoracic aortic aneurysms: computed tomographic evaluation. Artif Organs. 2001;25:223-7. [Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
S. Rubin, A. Bayle, A. Poncet, and B. Baehrel
Retrograde aortic dissection after a stent graft repair of a type B dissection: how to improve the endovascular technique
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2006; 5(6): 746 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. S. Mitchell
Stent grafts for the thoracic aorta: a new paradigm?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2002; 74(5): S1818 - 1820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Shinichi Takamoto
Yutaka Kotsuka
Hiroshi Kubota
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ninomiya, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kubota, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ninomiya, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kubota, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Great vessels


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS