|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:408-414
© 2003 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for acquired cardiovascular disease |
a Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
b Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
Received for publication March 18, 2002; revisions received April 3, 2002; revisions received April 17, 2002; accepted for publication April 23, 2002.
* Address for reprints: Enrico Ruffini, MD, Thoracic Surgery, University of Torino, 3, Via Genova 10126, Torino, Italy
enrico.ruffini{at}unito.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Posttraumatic or iatrogenic foreign bodies in the heart can be treated either conservatively or surgically. Controversy exists about optimal management.
METHODS: Fourteen cases of posttraumatic or iatrogenic foreign bodies in the heart observed between 1955 and 2000 were studied. Our series includes the following: bullets into the right or left ventricle (4 cases); needles in the left ventricle, atrium, and pulmonary artery (3 cases); retained catheter fragments in the right ventricle, right atrium, or in the pulmonary artery (4 cases); a grenade fragment into the right atrium (1 case); a circular saw fragment into the right ventricle (1 case); and a commissurotomy ring into the left atrium (1 case).
RESULTS: Foreign bodies were removed when in the cardiac cavities (1 case); when in the presence of associated risk factors like embolism, arrhythmia, or infection (3 cases); and when in the presence of associated signs or symptoms including cardiac tamponade (2 cases), arrhythmia (1 case), fever (2 cases), or anxiety (1 case). Removal was accomplished by a thoracotomy (7 cases) or sternotomy (2 cases), with (3 cases) or without cardiopulmonary bypass, or percutaneously (1 case). Four asymptomatic patients were conservatively treated and have no evidence of complications at a median follow-up of 20 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The management of foreign bodies in the heart should be individualized: (1) symptomatic foreign bodies should be removed irrespective of their location; (2) asymptomatic foreign bodies diagnosed immediately after the injury with associated risk factors should be removed; (3) asymptomatic foreign bodies without associated risks factors or diagnosed late after the injury may be treated conservatively, particularly if they are completely embedded in the myocardium or in the pericardium.
The presence of a foreign body in the heart or great vessels can be due to a war trauma as in the case of blunt shot or an air rifle.1,2 Another cause can be the migration of a catheter fragment from a peripheral vessel to the heart or a needle migration to the heart as in the case of drug addicts.3-6
A needle lost in the babys bed subsequently penetrating in the babys thorax can be the cause of fever and weight loss in childhood but may also be observed occasionally years later.7 A possible embolization of a Kirschner wire to the heart or great vessels is also reported after orthopedic surgery.8 A pacemaker wire fragment represents a possible complication after cardiac surgery in patients with definitive pacing.9 Currently, diagnosis may be easily made by echocardiography, although it was more difficult when only conventional radiology was available as in earlier reports.10-15
The foreign body can be removed with a surgical or percutaneous approach according to the dimensions and composition of the foreign body.16,17 Controversy exists about optimal treatment in asymptomatic patients in whom the risk of embolization is low and a surgical procedure can be more dangerous than conservative treatment.10,18-20
To more clearly define optimal management of retained foreign bodies in the heart, we review our experience in 14 cases observed from 1955 to 2000 and review the literature on the subject.
| Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Bullets in the heart cavities (4 cases)
PATIENT 1. A 47-year-old man arrived at our hospital after a shooting. Angiographic study showed a bullet in the right ventricle. The clinical conditions were stable and conservative treatment was used. After 25 years, the patient is alive and well.
PATIENT 2. A 32-year-old man arrived at our hospital after a shooting. A chest x-ray film showed 2 bullets in the right ventricle and signs of pericardial effusion with an initial cardiac tamponade. A left anterior thoracotomy was performed; the bullets were removed and 200 mL of blood was drained from the pericardial space. After 29 years the patient is alive and well.
PATIENT 3. A 9-year-old boy underwent chest radiography during an epidemiologic study. A 4-mm bullet was evidenced in the outflow tract of the right ventricle (Figure 1). A gunshot in a limb had occurred 3 years before. Conservative treatment was chosen. The patient remains asymptomatic after 32 years.
|
Needles in the heart and pulmonary artery (3 cases)
PATIENT 1. A 2.5-year-old boy with recurrent fever had a needle in the left ventricle as evidenced by a chest x-ray film. The needle had penetrated during movements in the cradle. A left anterior thoracotomy at the fourth intercostal space allowed needle extraction without any other hemostatic maneuver. The needle was partially covered by fibrin and partially embedded in the ventricle, not protruding into the cardiac cavity. Forty years later the patient is alive and well (Figure 2).
|
PATIENT 3. A 51-year-old man had a fragmented needle on chest radiography, localized in the main pulmonary artery. The foreign body had been present in the heart since he was 6 years old. It probably penetrated with the same mechanism as in the other cases of intracardiac needles but without penetration in the vascular bed. Conservative treatment was adopted. The patient died 19 years later of cancer.
Retained catheter fragments in the heart or pulmonary artery (4 cases)
PATIENT 1. A 12-year-old boy had an atrial septal defect that was closed during mild hypothermic circulatory arrest with a probe thermal exchange. He received cardiac catheterization through an upper arm vein to evaluate a possible residual shunt. At the end of the procedure, a 10-cm catheter fragment broke and migrated into the right ventricle. A rethoracotomy was necessary. The foreign body was removed with a small incision of the pulmonary artery without cardiopulmonary bypass using mild hypothermic circulatory arrest (3 minutes). After 21 years the patient is alive and well.
PATIENT 2. A 62-year-old man had low cardiac output syndrome after coronary artery bypass grafting. A Swan-Ganz catheter (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calif) was necessary for 4 days. Difficulty was experienced during removal of the catheter; a chest x-ray film showed that the catheter was knotted and entrapped in the right atrium. A retoracotomy was undertaken under cardiopulmonary bypass for removal of the Swan-Ganz catheter.
PATIENT 3. A 22-year-old man had a 4-cm retained fragment of a central venous catheter in the right pulmonary artery. The patient, when informed of the foreign body, became anxious and asked for its removal. A right anterior thoracotomy was performed at the fourth intercostal space, and the foreign body was easily located by finger palpation and removed with a small incision in the right pulmonary artery without cardiopulmonary bypass.
PATIENT 4. A 32-year-old man with osteomyelitis had a Groshong catheter (C. R. Bard, Inc, Murray Hill, NJ) inserted for long-term antibiotic therapy. During infusion the patient had thoracic pain and a chest x-ray film showed a foreign body in the right pulmonary artery. Percutaneous removal was successfully performed.
Grenade fragment in the left atrium (1 case)
PATIENT 1. A 51-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for recurrent paroxysmal tachyarrhythmia. A standard chest x-ray film showed a grenade fragment near the left atrium close to the superior vena cava junction. Twenty years earlier, during World War II, the patient was involved in a grenade explosion. A right anterior thoracotomy was performed at the sixth intercostal space; the foreign body was located by finger and removed without cardiopulmonary bypass (Figures 3 and 4).
In the following years no further arrhythmia was observed, and the patient died 17 years later of an unknown cause.
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Diagnosis of cardiac foreign bodies may be suspected immediately after the injury or incidentally during investigation for another condition when the missile has remained silent for an extended time. The clinical manifestations of a retained foreign body in the heart immediately after the injury are those related to the cardiac injury, including cardiac tamponade and/or bleeding; if the missile did not injure the valves or septa, the patient may also be symptom-free at presentation. When diagnosed later, most cardiac foreign bodies have been entrapped by fibrous tissue andif the patient is asymptomaticdo not cause particular harm. Finally, in some cases, a patient becomes symptomatic many years after diagnosis of foreign body that had been treated conservatively.10,20 Patient histories and chest x-ray films were sufficient in our initial cases to make a correct diagnosis. In other historical reports, diagnosis was suspected with x-ray films and confirmed with fluoroscopy or angiocardiography.1,23 In the most recent reports, the missiles were correctly diagnosed and located by echocardiography and computed tomographic scan.5,20,11 Intraoperative imaging studies are important to demonstrate migration of the foreign body during patient positioning.20 The use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography can be useful to identify foreign bodies into the cardiac muscle including bullets or needles.15,20,23
Treatment options including surgery or a conservative approach must be tailored case by case in relation to symptoms and possible associated risks.10,19,20,25,26
In symptomatic patients, the presence of symptoms is a primary indication for surgery, especially in case of cardiac tamponade or after blunt trauma.10,23 The most common symptoms are fever, pericarditis and pericardial effusion, arrhythmia, thrombi, and neurotic manifestations, mainly anxiety. Among symptoms, fever may result from infection of pericardium or endocardium or sepsis, particularly from contaminated fragments.25-27 Pericarditis and recurrent pericardial effusion result from missile penetration into the pericardium and are common if the patient was conservatively treated at the time of trauma.28 Recurrent pericarditis may result from inflammation of the epicardium due to the movements of the heart against the foreign body, causing intrapericardial bleeding and inflammation.10,28 Arrhythmia or cerebrovascular accident due to embolization of the foreign body and thrombus formation are indications for surgical removal irrespective of the nature of the foreign body.10,18,29,30 The presence of neurotic manifestations is of particular interest: comprehensibly, some patients become anxious about the presence of a cardiac foreign body, as observed in one case in our experience. This, in our opinion, may be an indication for surgical removal.10,27,31
In asymptomatic patients, indication for surgery depends on the nature and location of the foreign body. Patients with the foreign bodies completely embedded in the myocardium or in the pericardial space usually remained symptom-free for a time.10 Symbas and colleagues10 in their review suggest that these foreign bodies could left in place. Our experience with 4 patients confirms this. Differently, intracavitary missiles or missiles partially embedded in the myocardium, particularly in the left side of the heart, should be removed because of the risk of infection or embolization.10 A possible exception may be missiles incidentally diagnosed years after the trauma.
Finally, the iatrogenic nature of some foreign bodies is associated with medicolegal implications that sometimes can influence the choice between surgical or conservative treatment.
Surgical options depend on the localization of the foreign body and the need for cardiopulmonary bypass.20 Some authors suggest a median sternotomy approach in particular if pericardiectomy is needed.31,32 Culliford and colleagues32 found that in these cases median sternotomy results in decreased morbidity and reduced hospitalization compared with thoracotomy.32 The same results were obtained by LeMarie and colleagues.28
In the present series, the surgical approach was thoracotomy in 7 cases (2 with cardiopulmonary bypass), median sternotomy in 2 cases (1 with cardiopulmonary bypass), and percutaneous access in 1 patient. In our opinion, cardiopulmonary bypass should be instituted only if strictly necessary. Criteria for the need of cardiopulmonary bypass include the time interval between diagnosis or treatment and the injury and the precise location of the missile within the heart, along with its relationship with the cardiac cavities. In our experience, all missiles that have been lodged for many years in the heart, those that presented with a partially exposed portion outside the cardiac cavities, or those that could be easily located by finger palpation could be approached without cardiopulmonary bypass. Percutaneous removal is indicated in the presence of catheter fragments and should be done as initial treatment, not precluding subsequent surgery.3,16,17,33,34 Conservative management requires follow-up, anticoagulation, and antibiotic prophylaxis.23
To conclude, the management of foreign bodies in the heart should be discussed on an individual basis:
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. K Agarwal, A. Singh, M. Kathuria, and P. K Ghosh Wandering Bullet Embolizing to the Pulmonary Artery: A Case Report Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, April 1, 2007; 15(2): 154 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. J. Kim, J. Y. Kim, B. W. Choi, J. E. Nam, T. H. Kim, and K. O. Choe Right Ventricular Acupuncture Needle Embolism Detected on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Circulation, December 5, 2006; 114(23): e623 - e626. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Medved, O. Simic, M. Bralic, V. Stemberga, M. Kovacevic, A. Matana, and A. Bosnar Chronic Heart Perforation With 13.5 cm Long Kirschner Wire Without Pericardial Tamponade: An Unusual Sequelae After Shoulder Fracture. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 81(5): 1895 - 1897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Yang and X. Shen A Piece of Glass in the Heart Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2006; 81(1): 335 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. De Raet, U. Mees, J. Vandekerkhof, and M. Hendrikx Penetrating pediatric cardiac trauma caused by fall on a pencil with normal echocardiography Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2004; 3(4): 634 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |