JTCS Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Stuart W. Jamieson
Patricia A. Thistlethwaite
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Thistlethwaite, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Thistlethwaite, P. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular biology

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:671-679
© 2003 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

Cardiopulmonary support and physiology

Direct comparison of efficiency and stability of gene transfer into the mammalian heart using adeno-associated virus versus adenovirus vectors

Danny Chu, MDa, Christopher C. Sullivan, MSa, Matthew D. Weitzman, PhDb, Lingling Du, MDa, Paul L. Wolf, MDc, Stuart W. Jamieson, MB, FRCSa, Patricia A. Thistlethwaite, MD, PhDa,*

a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, Calif, USA
b Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, Calif, USA
c Department of Pathology, Veterans Administration Medical Center, La Jolla, Calif, USA

Received for publication March 5, 2002; revisions received August 19, 2002; revisions received October 11, 2002; accepted for publication December 4, 2002.

* Address for reprints: Patricia A. Thistlethwaite, MD, PhD, University of California at San Diego, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 200 West Arbor Dr, San Diego, CA 92103-8892, USA
pthistlethwaite{at}ucsd.edu


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Materials and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
OBJECTIVE: Recent gene therapy strategies have relied on the use of adenovirus or plasmid as vehicles for gene delivery to the heart. These approaches have been limited by low transduction frequencies and transient transgene expression. We sought to determine whether adeno-associated virus produces more stable, higher efficiency gene expression in the rodent heart than did previous conventional methods.

METHODS: Two recombinant viral constructs were made: an adeno-associated virus containing the lacZ gene under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter (AAV-lacZ) and an adenovirus expressing lacZ under the control of the same promoter (Adeno-lacZ). Twenty rats were injected (into the ventricular apex) with 1 x 107-8 genomic particles of each virus. Animals were put to death at serial time points and transgene expression quantitated by ß-galactosidase activity, myocardial staining, and Western blot protein analysis.

RESULTS: Three months after adeno-associated virus gene transfer, animals demonstrated stable ß-galactosidase expression in 60% of cardiomyocytes without evidence of myocardial inflammation/necrosis. The distribution and degree of protein expression and number of positive cells at 3 months were equivalent to transgene expression at 4 weeks. Adeno-associated virus was not detected in organs other than the heart. In contrast, Adeno-lacZ animals displayed transient ß-galactosidase activity in 60% of cardiomyocytes, which was undetectable 4 weeks after gene transfer. Adenovirus-treated animals manifest significant myocardial inflammation and had transgene expression in other organs.

CONCLUSION: Direct intramyocardial injection of an adeno-associated virus vector programs stable, long-term, cardiac-specific transgene expression in the rodent heart for up to 3 months. Our results suggest adeno-associated virus has significant advantages for long-term transgene expression in the heart compared to adenovirus vectors.

The transfer of genes into the heart, resulting in the expression of select proteins, is a promising research tool and potential therapy for numerous cardiovascular diseases including ischemic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, and congestive heart failure. The utopian vector for long-term myocardial gene therapy would effect stable, efficient transduction of myocytes in vivo with any transgene, without causing toxicity or unwanted side effects. Most gene therapy experiments in the heart have focused on 3 main vector types: plasmid or naked fragment DNA,1 viral vectors (adenovirus-based systems,2 retroviruses,3 herpes viruses,4 and hybrid/gutless viruses5), and cationic liposomes.6 The choice of which vector system to use for sustained, highly efficient gene transfer remains controversial.

In recent years, adenovirus has been the vector used in early human gene therapy trials for the treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy, either as a sole modality or in conjunction with coronary artery bypass surgery.7,8 In animals, adenovirus vectors have been used for gene delivery into myocardium by direct intramuscular injection or via infusion of virus into the coronary arteries.9 These studies have demonstrated several limitations to adenovirus as a gene delivery tool for sustained transgene expression. First, transgene expression is transient, peaking between 24 hours and 7 days and retained for only 2 to 3 weeks; second, a significant cytotoxic, cell-mediated immune response is observed. The transient expression of transgene in adenoviral gene transfer is considered to be due to both an unstable episomal feature of the introduced DNA and the expression of viral proteins that elicit immunologic elimination of transduced cells via a CD8+ lymphocyte-mediated cell lysis.10

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors represent an alternative approach to cardiovascular gene therapy. These viruses contain no viral protein-coding sequences to stimulate an immune response, have the ability to integrate into the genome of the host, and do not require active cell division for expression to occur.11 This unique profile of biologic properties has allowed AAV to program efficient and stable recombinant gene expression in liver,12 skeletal muscle,13 retina,14 and brain15 in both rodents and primates. Recent reports have shown that AAV can transduce cardiomyocytes in vitro and in vivo.16-18 However, these studies demonstrated that the efficiency of AAV-mediated transgene expression in the heart was low (approximately 0.2%-1.0%). Although results have been published about both AAV and conventional adenovirus, there are no long-term direct comparisons of these vectors in an in vivo cardiovascular model under uniform conditions.

The goal of this study was to compare directly adenovirus and AAV with respect to relative efficiency, toxicity, and duration of expression after gene delivery by intramyocardial injection in a rodent model. This study defines a comparative analysis of spatial and temporal expression using these 2 viral vectors and serves as groundwork for optimizing the kinetics and longevity of genes introduced into the mammalian heart by direct injection. Our results suggest that AAV vectors may be useful for sustained, long-term gene expression in the heart without inducing inflammation or immunologic response.


   Materials and methods
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and methods
Results
 Comment
 References
 
Viral plasmid and vector production
Adenovirus vector containing lacZ gene was based on the Ad5 backbone with E1 and E3 deletions. The lacZ gene was subcloned into the adenoviral shuttle plasmid pShuttle-CMV (driven by cytomegalovirus promoter/enhancer) between XhoI and HindIII restriction enzyme sites in the multiple cloning site. The resulting plasmid, pShuttle-CMV-lacZ, was cotransfected with pAdEasy-1 (plasmid containing Ad5 genome with E1/E3 deletion) into 293 cells using the X-tremeGENE reagent (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland) to generate recombinant adenovirus containing the lacZ gene. Large-scale adenovirus vector preparation was performed as described previously, using CsCl2 density purification and dialysis.19 Genomic adenoviral titers were determined by spectrophotometric analysis of virus particle DNA. Adenoviral stocks were tested for levels of replication-competent adenovirus (RCA) by assessing cytopathic effects of our preparations on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). We found negligible (<1 x 107) cytopathic effects, confirming lack of contamination of our virus preparations with RCA.

Two cotransfection plasmids, pXX2 and pXX6, were used for AAV vector production. pXX2 contains the AAV rep and cap genes, while pXX6 has the adenoviral gene products that are required to facilitate AAV replication.20 The pAAV-lacZ was created by inserting lacZ into the pAAV-shuttle vector generated in our laboratory via standard subcloning techniques. This shuttle vector has two inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) required for AAV production, cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter/enhancer, multiple cloning site, and a simian virus 40 (SV40) polyadenylation tail signal. The lacZ gene was inserted into the multiple cloning site of the pAAV-shuttle vector between XhoI and HindIII restriction enzyme sites.

A large quantity of recombinant AAV serotype 2 containing the lacZ gene (AAV-lacZ) was produced and purified in our laboratory by cotransfecting low passage 293T cells. Triple cotransfections with pXX2, pXX6, and pAAV-lacZ plasmids were accomplished with Polyfect Transfecting Reagent (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif) when 293T cells were 80% to 90% confluent. Subsequently, the transfected 293T cells from 10 15-cm plates were incubated at 37°C and supplemented with fresh Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) growth media daily for 72 total hours. Cells collected in phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS) were centrifuged at 1000g at room temperature for 15 minutes. Cell pellets were redissolved in 25 mL of DMEM and underwent 2 cycles of freeze/thaw at -80°C and 37°C, respectively, with vigorous vortexing to lyse the cells. Benzonase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo) was added to the mixture for a final concentration of 50 U/mL to eliminate unpackaged DNA. Cellular debris was separated from the cleared cell lysate via centrifugation at 3000g at room temperature for 15 minutes. Deoxycholic acid (Sigma-Aldrich), which helps AAV to bind the heparin column, was added to the clear cell lysate for a final concentration of 0.5% and incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. Cell lysates were consecutively filtered through 5-µm and 0.8-µm filters (Millipore, San Jose, Calif). The lysates were then centrifuged at 9500g at 4°C for 10 minutes to further eliminate any remaining particulates.

AAV-lacZ high-grade purification was based on the single-step, gravity-flow column technique described by Auricchio and colleagues.21 Type I heparin columns (Sigma-Aldrich) were equilibrated with 5 column volumes of PBS/1 mmol/L MgCl2 at a rate of 0.5 mL/min using an Econo-Pump (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif). The cleared cell lysate was added directly to the column with a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. The column was subsequently washed with 5 column volumes of PBS/1 mmol/L MgCl2/0.1 mol/L NaCl at a rate of 0.5 mL/min. The virus was eluted with 6 mL PBS/1 mmol/L MgCl2/0.4 mol/L NaCl at a rate of 0.5 mL/min. The first 1.5-mL volume of flow-through was discarded. The next 4 mL of flow-through was collected in 1-mL fractions. The concentration of the AAV-lacZ was determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction (7700 Sequence Detector, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif) with an SYBR Green detection kit (Applied Biosystems). The viral preparation was desalted by dialyzing the preparation against 2 L PBS/1 mmol/L MgCl2 at 4°C twice and, subsequently, sterile-filtered through a 0.2-µm filter (Millipore). All viral preparations had at least 1 x 1011 genomic particles per milliliter. The purified vectors were then retested for their transgene expression by infecting 293 cells.

Gene transfer protocol into rat hearts in vivo
Fischer rats (12-14 weeks old; Harlan, San Diego, Calif) were anesthetized with intraperitoneal ketamine (50 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg). The animals were intubated with a 14-gauge, 2.54-cm angiocatheter under direct vision and ventilated with a Harvard rodent ventilator model 683 (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, Mass) with minute ventilation of 150 mL/min. The heart was exposed via a left anterolateral thoracotomy incision at the fourth intercostal space. Next, 2 x 108 genomic particles of AAV-lacZ in 200 µl PBS/1 mmol/L MgCl2 were injected intramyocardially into the left apex of the heart divided into 3 separate injections covering an area of approximately 0.75 cm2 in each of 16 rats in the AAV-lacZ group; 2 x 107 genomic particles of Adeno-lacZ in 200 µl PBS/1 mmol/L MgCl2 were injected in a similar fashion into the hearts of 16 rats in the Adeno-lacZ group. Injections were performed with a 27-gauge needle. Absence of blood with syringe aspiration and blanching of the myocardium during injection of the virus confirmed successful intramyocardial delivery of viral vectors. Negative intrapleural pressure was re-established by evacuation of air out of the chest by small tube syringe aspiration before chest closure.

At the completion of the procedure, atipamezole (2.5 mg/kg; Animal Health, Exton, Pa) was injected intraperitoneally to reverse anesthetic effects. The endotracheal angiocatheter was removed after voluntary respiratory efforts were evident. A single investigator performed all the rodent operations. The mortality for gene transfer surgery was 7.7% or 4 of 64 animals (1 rodent in the AAV-lacZ group, 2 animals in the Adeno-lacZ group, and 1 rodent in the PBS group). Death occurred during surgery due to traumatic intubation or anesthetic overdose in 2 animals, while death occurred 24 to 48 hours after surgery in 2 animals. The surviving animals (n = 4 for each group at each time point) were put to death at 36 hours, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 5 months after gene delivery with intraperitoneal pentobarbital. All animals were cared for and put to death in accordance with the National Institutes of Health's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication Vol. 25, No. 28, revised 1996).

X-gal staining and histologic analysis
After explant, whole hearts were rinsed 3 times with PBS and fixed overnight at 4°C in 4% paraldehyde. Cardiomyocytes expressing enzymatically active ß-galactosidase (ß-gal) were detected by 24-hour incubation of whole hearts at 37°C with the chromogenic substrate X-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactoside), which yields an insoluble blue precipitate when cleaved. Gross sections were photographed with a Kodak professional DCS300 digital camera (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) with a macro–photo lens at 2x magnification.

A second cohort of hearts from each time point was stained with X-gal as described above, fixed in 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at 10 µm thickness. Hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) staining was performed on these sections for histologic analysis. The hearts were sectioned perpendicular to their long axis. From the apical paraffin blocks, 10 short axis sections were taken at 1-mm intervals to incorporate the distal 1.0 cm of the heart from base to apex. Usually the lower middle sections incorporated the needle tracks. Each heart section contained between 1500 and 3000 myocytes. Positive X-gal staining cells were counted in each section. The mean number of positive cells from each heart within each group was then reported as the percentage of positive cells in relation to the total number of myocytes counted. Photographs were taken with a fixed angle to the histologic slides using an Olympus U-DO microscope with built-in DVC-1300C digital camera (Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan) at 20x magnification.

Western blot analysis and ß-galactosidase activity assay
Protein extraction and Western blots were performed as previously described22 with 40 µg of total protein isolated from the area of gene injection in each heart sample and a monoclonal anti-ß-galactosidase antibody (Promega, Madison, Wis) followed by NBT/BCIP (Promega) substrate development. To test for ß-gal activity, 100 µg protein from each heart sample was added to 800 µg o-nitrophenyl-ß-D-galactose (ONPG) substrate in 1 ml of PM-2 buffer (23 mmol/L NaH2PO4, 77 mmol/L Na2HPO4, 0.1 mmol/L MnCl2, 2 mmol/L MgSO4, 40 mmol/L ß-mercaptoethanol, pH 7.3) at 37°C for 30 minutes. The reaction was stopped by adding 500 µl of 1 mol/L Na2CO3. Beta-gal activity was directly proportional to the color intensity of the enzymatic reaction measured at 420 nm. Absorbance at 420 nm was measured by spectrophotometer (Ultraspec II, Biochrom, Cambridge, United Kingdom).

Statistical analysis
Values for the ß-gal activity assay were expressed as the mean ± SEM. Continuous variables were compared by the Student t test.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and methods
 Results
Comment
 References
 
Comparison of the stability and efficiency of transduction of AAV and adenovirus vectors in the myocardium
AAV-lacZ and Adeno-lacZ vectors were each injected into the ventricular apical myocardium of 20 immunocompetent Fischer rats (12-14 weeks old) via a left thoracotomy approach. Sham-injected hearts were inoculated with an equal volume of PBS/1 mmol/L MgCl2 (the carrier solution for viral injections). The hearts were collected 36 hours, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 5 months after viral inoculation; four hearts were collected at each time point for both viral groups and the sham-injected group. ß-gal expression in the myocardial tissue was assayed by X-gal staining.

As shown in Figure 1, a significant difference in temporal expression of the transduced lacZ gene in the heart was found. For animals infected with the adenovirus vector, ß-gal expression was detected at the area of injection in gross heart specimens at 36 hours and 7 days after the gene transfer and was not detected at any subsequent time points. In contrast, AAV-injected hearts showed ß-gal expression beginning 1 month after gene transduction and continuing up to 3 months after gene transfer. Transgene expression was lost by 5 months after myocardial gene delivery. Gross myocardial staining at 1 month in the AAV-lacZ–transduced hearts was similar to the amount of staining seen at 3 months, suggesting that transgene expression was persistent without dimunition over this long interval. This result contrasts to the short time interval of less than 1 month seen for transgene expression in the heart using an adenovirus vector.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Gross photographs of rat hearts cut axially at various time points after gene delivery (X-gal stained for 24 hours, magnification x2). Adeno, Adeno-lacZ–injected hearts; AAV, AAV-lacZ–injected hearts.

 
X-gal staining for both the adenovirus and AAV groups was limited to an area of 1.0 cm2 around the injection sites and was transmural in distribution. The majority of ß-gal–positive cells in both groups were cardiomyocytes, as identified by light microscopy. Adenovirus delivery of transgene resulted in X-gal staining of both cardiomyocytes and macrophages, while AAV delivery of transgene resulted in X-gal staining of cardiomyocytes only. Approximately 60% of cardiomyocytes within an area of 0.75 cm2 around the injection stained positive for ß-gal for both adenovirus and AAV groups, whereas only 10% of cardiomyocytes (0.75-1.0 cm2 from the injection) stained positive in both viral groups. We, therefore, found no difference in the spatial distribution of AAV or adenovirus gene expression in the heart using the direct injection approach.

To compare directly the efficiency and stability of AAV-mediated gene transfer with that of adenovirus, we injected adult Fischer rat hearts with either AAV-lacZ or Adeno-lacZ and quantitatively assayed them for ß-gal by Western blot analysis and ß-gal activity by enzymatic assay at different times after injection (Figures 2 and 3). Consistent with previous reports,9 direct intramyocardial injection of Adeno-lacZ resulted in transient transgene expression, with peak levels of ß-gal and peak levels of ß-gal activity measured 36 hours to 7 days after injection. By 4 weeks after myocardial transfer, transgene expression at the protein level was undetectable in the Adeno-lacZ–injected hearts. In contrast, ß-gal activity in the hearts injected with AAV-lacZ was first detected 1 month after gene transfer and continued at a consistent level for up to 3 months. Peak levels of ß-gal activity in the AAV-lacZ–injected hearts were approximately 70% of those seen with Adeno-lacZ (Figure 3). Similarly, by Western blot analysis, ß-gal was present in the hearts of animals injected with the AAV construct for up to 3 months after injection. The levels of ß-gal protein measured were similar between the adenovirus- and AAV-injected myocardium.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Western blots of ß-galactosidase and actin filament protein expression from rat hearts at various time points after gene delivery. Actin, Actin filament protein; LacZ, ß-galactosidase protein; d, day; kD, kilodalton; m, month; Adeno-lacZ, Adeno-lacZ–injected hearts; AAV-lacZ, AAV-lacZ–injected hearts.

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Beta-galactosidase activity assay of rat hearts after intramyocardial injection of AAV-lacZ or Adeno-lacZ at various time points. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *P < .05 versus Adeno-lacZ group. Adeno, Adeno-lacZ–injected hearts; AAV, AAV-lacZ–injected hearts; d, day; m, month; nm, nanometer.

 
Tissue specificity of transgene expression: comparison of AAV and adenovirus
Direct myocardial injection of AAV-lacZ resulted in transgene protein (ß-gal protein) expression in the heart alone (Figure 4). This finding suggests that AAV gene constructs can be targeted directly to myocardial tissue, without spillover into other organs. In contrast, myocardial transduction with Adeno-lacZ consistently resulted in ß-gal protein detection, by Western blot analysis, in both the heart and lungs. Macrophages in the lung were the principal cell type expressing the transgene. Although other studies using an intracoronary delivery of adenovirus have reported transgene expression in other organs such as the liver and testes,23 we did not find this pattern of expression in organs outside the chest using a direct myocardial injection route. We were unable to detect either AAV or adenoviral DNA in peripheral circulation of our injected animals by polymerase chain reaction at 10 minutes, 1 hour, 6 hours, and 24 hours after viral myocardial injection (data not shown), indicating this gene delivery technique did not result in systemic circulation of recombinant virus.



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 4. Western blots of ß-galactosidase and actin filament protein expression from various rat organs 1 month after intramyocardial injection of AAV-lacZ and 7 days after intramyocardial injection of Adeno-lacZ. Actin, Actin filament protein; kD, kilodalton; LacZ, ß-galactosidase protein.

 
Intramyocardial injection of AAV does not provoke an inflammatory response
The amount of inflammation associated with intramyocardial injection of virus differed markedly between vectors. Direct intramyocardial injection of carrier alone resulted in minimal pathologic response with absence of acute cellular infiltrate at 7 days. However, by 1 month postinjection, fibrous tissue lined the needle track. Direct intramyocardial injection of AAV-lacZ was identical microscopically to sham injection at all time points, even when transgene expression was abundant (Figure 5). These appearances were in marked contrast to Adeno-lacZ, which caused significant inflammation with cellular infiltrate of lymphocytes, macrophages, monocytes at 36 hours and lymphocytes, macrophages, monocytes, and fibroblasts at day 7. At 1 month postinjection, the Adeno-lacZ hearts still had evidence of significant inflammatory infiltrate and fibrous scarring replacing previously viable myocytes.



View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 5. Photomicrographs of rat hearts at 7 days and 1 month after intramyocardial injection (hematoxylin and eosin stained, X-gal stained, magnification x20). Arrows denote examples of cardiomyocytes positive for ß-galactosidase expression. Adeno, Adeno-lacZ–injected heart; AAV, AAV-lacZ–injected heart; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline–injected heart.

 

   Comment
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Comment
References
 
This report presents a parallel comparison of 2 viral vectors currently used in gene therapy experiments. In a reproducible, systematic way, we compared the efficiency of viral transduction, spatial pattern of exogenous gene expression, and the duration of transgene protein expression in the in vivo rodent heart. Although there have been many reports about different viral vectors and their efficiency in other organs and in cultured myocytes, most have focused on a particular gene of interest and have been limited to 1 selected vector system.

Our goal is to explore and perfect new gene delivery systems available to effect long-term, site-specific gene expression in the mammalian heart. The premise for these experiments is that there have been few controlled studies published that directly compare one viral gene therapy system to another in in vivo myocardial models using a surgical approach.24,25 We chose the direct intramyocardial injection route for gene delivery, because this method is uniquely available to the thoracic surgeon. We do not know whether direct myocardial injection, which limits transgene expression to a fixed area of the heart, is the most effective way to deliver genes to the myocardium, nor can we speculate whether this method will ultimately be effective for the treatment of human heart disease. In this report, we demonstrate efficient and stable transduction of cardiac myocytes in vivo up to 3 months after intramyocardial injection of an AAV-lacZ vector. Our results suggest that AAV has significant advantages compared with conventional adenovirus vectors in terms of longevity of gene expression and paucity of pathologic toxicity.

Several conclusions may be drawn from this set of experiments. First, pure high titer AAV vectors can be constructed, grown, and purified with relative ease using newer techniques published over the past year.21 Earlier AAV purification methods were prone to impurities (crude cell lysate preparations), low multiplicity of infection virus (CsCl2 gradient centrifugation), or demanded a high level of technical expertise to recover high titer virus (iodixanol or HPLC purification). We currently use a modified, single-step, heparin-column purification technique; elution dimunition of viral titer is avoided while allowing for high titer purification without helper adenovirus.

Second, transgene expression with AAV in the mammalian heart lasts on the order of months, and transduction efficiency is similar to that seen with adenovirus. Although AAV transgene expression was not apparent until 4 weeks after gene transfer, it was persistent for up to 3 months after transduction. Indeed, we demonstrated that ß-gal protein expression and enzymatic activity was as strong at 3 months after gene transfer as it was at 4 weeks. This contrasts to the adenovirus system, where we found (like other groups) that expression peaked in the period of 36 hours to 7 days in the heart and then gradually diminished to the point of being undetectable by Western analysis or ß-gal assay by 4 weeks.

Third, AAV transgene expression is limited to the heart and cannot be detected in other organs after intramyocardial injection, whereas adenovirus transgene expression was detected in low amounts in both heart and lung. We believe that the severe inflammatory response associated with adenovirus transduction of the heart results in the local accumulation of macrophages and coinfection of this cell type. This tropism to cells other than myocytes after injection of the heart was seen only with adenovirus and not AAV. The fact that animals injected with adenovirus had transgene expression in lung macrophages underscores the hypothesis that lack of organ specificity of transgene expression may be due to the dissemination of migratory, inflammatory-type cells. Although myocardial inflammation with adenovirus injection has been reported previously,24,26 the techniques of CsCl2 (which we used) and HPLC virus purification have been associated with significantly less myocardial inflammation than that seen in earlier studies.27,28 Since the viruses did not enter the systemic circulation, they were not detected in other organs, as has been found for intracoronary injection of viral vectors.23 Additionally, we found that injection of comparable viral titer, by the same investigator, in the same age and strain of rat resulted in comparable transgene transduction efficiencies for both adenovirus and AAV. This result was reproducible and was independent of viral stock preparation.

Last, although intramyocardial injection limited AAV infection to the heart, there is a relatively small perimeter of transgene spread at each site of injection. This technique allowed for precise targeting to a specific region of the heart, albeit a region for each injection of only 1.0 cm2. This result suggests that for use in larger animals or humans, multiple injections will be necessary to cover larger territories of myocardium.

Two important questions remain to be addressed with regard to AAV as an effective gene therapy tool: Why is the onset of transgene expression delayed and why does transgene expression abate around 5 months after gene transfer?

AAV is a single-stranded DNA virus that has to be converted into a double-stranded form before it can be transcriptionally active. In actively dividing cells, this process is thought to occur over a short time period due to the presence of cellular DNA polymerases.29 In nondividing cells (like cardiac myocytes), gene expression after injection of purified AAV occurs between 8 and 31 days later. The delay in transgene expression that we experienced with AAV is presumably due to a time-dependent conversion to a transcriptionally active, double-stranded DNA intermediate. In contrast, another group has reported maximal transgene expression at days 3 to 5 with AAV in porcine and rat myocardium.16 We believe that, since viral preparation was based on a crude cell lysate in this report, early transgene expression was due to inadvertent transfer of contaminating helper virus or reporter protein, a phenomenon known as pseudotransfection.30

Finally, it is unclear why AAV gene expression is ultimately "lost" from the rodent heart around 5 months after gene transfer, whereas AAV skeletal muscle gene expression has been found to be still detectable at 1 year.13 Although we were able to detect lacZ gene presence in the heart by Southern blot analysis 6 months after gene transfer, this gene was not detected as a transcribed or translated product at this time interval, suggesting that chromatin remodeling may play a role in long-term expression of foreign genes incorporated into the host genome. We have reviewed all published gene therapy experiments performed with direct myocardial injection of AAV irrespective of transgene (Table 1). 16,17,24,25,31-35 Although these reports suggest a transgene expression window ranging from 2 to 4 months, most studies terminate when transgene expression is still detected and do not necessarily represent the long-term natural history of this vector in the heart. Modification of virus by serotype selection, genetic manipulation of virion coat protein tropism, and better understanding of the kinetics of viral DNA integration may lead to higher titer, permanent AAV transduction in the heart.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Summary of direct intramyocardial injection of AAV

 
In summary, despite these caveats, our results suggest that AAV vectors have significant advantage over adenovirus vectors for stable, long-term expression of recombinant genes in cardiomyocytes in vivo, and, as such, may represent the future vehicle for the treatment of many forms of cardiac disease.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. R. Jude Samulski for gifts of cotransfecting plasmids pXX2 and pXX6. We also thank Paul Shragg, MA, Biostatistics, for statistical analysis of the study data.


   Footnotes
 
Supported by a Charles B. Wang Foundation research grant.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Vale PR, Losordo DW, Milliken CE, McDonald MC, Gravelin LM, Curry CM, et al. Randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of catheter-based myocardial gene transfer for therapeutic angiogenesis using left ventricular electromechanical mapping in patients with chronic myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 2001;103:2138–2143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Giordano FJ, Ping P, McKirnan D, Nozaki S, DeMaria AN, Dillmann WH, et al. Intracoronary gene transfer of fibroblast growth factor-5 increases blood flow and contractile function in an ischemic region of the heart. Nat Med. 1996;2:534–539[Medline]
  3. Byun J, Huh JE, Park SJ, Jang JE, Suh YL, Lee JS, et al. Myocardial injury-induced fibroblast proliferation facilitates retroviral-mediated gene transfer to the rat heart in vivo. J Gene Med. 2000;2:2–10[Medline]
  4. Coffin RS, Howard MK, Cumming DV, Dollery CM, McEwan J, Yellon DM, et al. Gene delivery to the heart in vivo and to cardiac myocytes and vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro using herpes virus vectors. Gene Ther. 1996;3:560–566[Medline]
  5. Morral N, O'Neal W, Rice K, Leland K, Kaplan J, Piedra PA, et al. Administration of helper-dependent adenoviral vectors and sequential delivery of different vector serotype for long-term liver-directed gene transfer in baboons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:12816–12821[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Jayakumar J, Suzuki K, Sammut IA, Smolenski RT, Khan M, Latif N, et al. Heat shock protein 70 gene transfection protects mitochondrial and ventricular function against ischemia-reperfusion injury. Circulation. 2001;104(12 Suppl 1):I303–307
  7. Hammond HK, McKirnan MD. Angiogenic gene therapy for heart disease: a review of animal studies and clinical trials. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;49:561–567[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Rosengart TK, Lee LY, Patel SR, Sanborn TA, Parikh M, Bergman GW, et al. Angiogenesis gene therapy: phase I assessment of direct intramyocardial administration of an adenovirus vector expressing VEGF121 cDNA to individuals with clinically significant severe coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1999;100:468–474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Muhlhauser J, Jones M, Yamada I, Cirielli C, Lemarchand P, Gloe TR, et al. Safety and efficacy of in vivo gene transfer into the porcine heart with replication-deficient, recombinant adenovirus vectors. Gene Ther. 1996;3:145–153[Medline]
  10. Chirmule N, Moscioni AD, Qian Y, Qian R, Chen Y, Wilson JM. Fas-Fas ligand interactions play a major role in effector functions of cytotoxic T lymphocytes after adenovirus vector-mediated gene transfer. Hum Gene Ther. 1999;10:259–269[Medline]
  11. Flotte TR, Carter BJ. Adeno-associated virus vectors for gene therapy. Gene Ther. 1995;2:357–362[Medline]
  12. Nakai H, Yant SR, Storm TA, Fuess S, Meuse L, Kay MA. Extrachromosomal recombinant adeno-associated virus vector genomes are primarily responsible for stable liver transduction in vivo. J Virol. 2001;75:6969–6976[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Xiao X, Li J, Samulski RJ. Efficient long-term gene transfer into muscle tissue of immunocompetent mice by adeno-associated virus vector. J Virol. 1996;70:8098–8108[Abstract]
  14. Flannery JG, Zolotukhin S, Vaquero MI, LaVail MM, Muzyczka N, Hauswirth WW. Efficient photoreceptor-targeted gene expression in vivo by recombinant adeno-associated virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:6916–6921[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Fu H, Samulski RJ, McCown TJ, Picornell YJ, Fletcher D, Muenzer J. Neurological correction of lysosomal storage in a mucopolysaccharidosis IIIB mouse model by adeno-associated virus-mediated gene delivery. Mol Ther. 2002;5:42–49[Medline]
  16. Kaplitt MG, Xiao X, Samulski RJ, Li J, Ojamaa K, Klein IL, et al. Long-term gene transfer in porcine myocardium after coronary infusion of an adeno-associated virus vector. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:1669–1676[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wright MJ, Wightman LM, Lilley C, de Alwis M, Hart SL, Miller A, et al. In vivo myocardial gene transfer: optimization, evaluation and direct comparison of gene transfer vectors. Basic Res Cardiol. 2001;96:227–236[Medline]
  18. Maeda Y, Ikeda U, Shimpo M, Ueno S, Ogasawara Y, Urabe M, et al. Efficient gene transfer into cardiac myocytes using adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1998;30:1341–1348[Medline]
  19. Giordano FJ, He H, McDonough P, Meyer M, Sayen MR, Dillmann WH. Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer reconstitutes depressed sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase levels and shortens prolonged cardiac myocyte Ca2+ transients. Circulation. 1997;96:400–403[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Xiao X, Li J, Samulski RJ. Production of high-titer recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors in the absence of helper adenovirus. J Virol. 1998;72:2224–2232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Auricchio A, Hildinger M, O'Connor E, Gao GP, Wilson JM. Isolation of highly infectious and pure adeno-associated virus type 2 vectors with a single-step gravity-flow column. Hum Gene Ther. 2001;12:71–76[Medline]
  22. Thistlethwaite PA, Lee SH, Du LL, Wolf PL, Sullivan C, Pradhan S, et al. Human angiopoietin gene expression is a marker for severity of pulmonary hypertension in patients undergoing pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:65–73[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Barr E, Carroll J, Kalynych AM, Tripathy SK, Kozarsky K, Wison JM, et al. Efficient catheter-mediated gene transfer into the heart using replication-defective adenovirus. Gene Ther. 1994;1:51–58[Medline]
  24. Svensson EC, Marshall DJ, Woodard K, Lin H, Jiang F, Chu L, et al. Efficient and stable transduction of cardiomyocytes after intramyocardial injection or intracoronary perfusion with recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors. Circulation. 1999;99:201–205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Lee LY, Zhou X, Polce DR, El-Sawy T, Patel SR, Thakker GD, et al. Exogenous control of cardiac gene therapy: evidence of regulated myocardial transgene expression after adenovirus and adeno-associated virus transfer of expression cassettes containing corticosteroid response element promoters. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118:26–35[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. French BA, Mazur W, Geske RS, Bolli R. Direct in vivo gene transfer into porcine myocardium using replication-deficient adenoviral vectors. Circulation. 1994;90:2414–2424[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Patel SR, Lee LY, Mack CA, Polce DR, El-Sawy T, Hackett NR, et al. Safety of direct myocardial administration of an adenovirus vector encoding vascular endothelial growth factor 121. Hum Gene Ther. 1999;10:1331–1348[Medline]
  28. Chan SY, Li K, Piccotti JR, Louie MC, Judge TA, Turka LA, et al. Tissue-specific consequences of the anti-adenoviral immune response: implications for cardiac transplants. Nat Med. 1999;5:1143–1149[Medline]
  29. Fisher KJ, Gao GP, Weitzman MD, DeMatteo R, Burda JF, Wilson JM. Transduction with recombinant adeno-associated virus for gene therapy is limited by leading-strand synthesis. J Virol. 1996;70:520–532[Abstract]
  30. Alexander IE, Russell DW, Miller AD. Transfer of contaminants in adeno-associated virus vector stocks can mimic transduction and lead to artifactual results. Hum Gen Ther. 1997;8:1911–1920[Medline]
  31. Su H, Lu R, Kan YW. Adeno-associated viral vector-mediated vascular endothelial growth factor gene transfer induces neovascular formation in ischemic heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:13801–13806[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Kawada T, Sakamoto A, Nakazawa M, Urabe M, Masuda F, Hemmi C, et al. Morphological and physiological restorations of hereditary form of dilated cardiomyopathy by somatic gene therapy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;284:431–435[Medline]
  33. Kimura B, Mohuczy D, Tang X, Phillips MI. Attenuation of hypertension and heart hypertrophy by adeno-associated virus delivering angiotensinogen antisense. Hypertension. 2001;37:376–380[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Kawada T, Nakazawa M, Nakauchi S, Yamazaki K, Shimamoto R, Urabe M, et al. Rescue of hereditary form of dilated cardiomyopathy by rAAV-mediated somatic gene therapy: amelioration of morphological findings, sarcolemmal permeability, cardiac performances, and the prognosis of TO-2 hamsters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:901–906[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Melo LG, Agrawal R, Zhang L, Rezvani M, Mangi AA, Ehsan A, et al. Gene therapy strategy for long-term myocardial protection using adeno-associated virus-mediated delivery of heme oxygenase gene. Circulation. 2002;105:602–607[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Y. Kawase, H. Q. Ly, F. Prunier, D. Lebeche, Y. Shi, H. Jin, L. Hadri, R. Yoneyama, K. Hoshino, Y. Takewa, et al.
Reversal of cardiac dysfunction after long-term expression of SERCA2a by gene transfer in a pre-clinical model of heart failure.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 18, 2008; 51(11): 1112 - 1119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 HeartHome page
A R Lyon, M Sato, R J Hajjar, R J Samulski, and S E Harding
Gene therapy: targeting the myocardium
Heart, January 1, 2008; 94(1): 89 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cardiovasc ResHome page
O. J. Muller, H. A. Katus, and R. Bekeredjian
Targeting the heart with gene therapy-optimized gene delivery methods
Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2007; 73(3): 453 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Kido, L. Du, C. C. Sullivan, R. Deutsch, S. W. Jamieson, and P. A. Thistlethwaite
Gene transfer of a TIE2 receptor antagonist prevents pulmonary hypertension in rodents
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2005; 129(2): 268 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Stuart W. Jamieson
Patricia A. Thistlethwaite
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Thistlethwaite, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Thistlethwaite, P. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular biology

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS