HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Joachim Pfannschmidt Hendrik Dienemann Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pfannschmidt, J. Articles by Dienemann, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pfannschmidt, J. Articles by Dienemann, H.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:732-739
© 2003 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery

General thoracic surgery

Prognostic factors and survival after complete resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma: Experiences in 167 patients

^a From the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Germany

Received for publication December 18, 2002; revisions received January 22, 2003; revisions received February 22, 2003; accepted for publication March 18, 2003.

^* Address for reprints: Joachim Pfannschmidt MD, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Amalienstr. 5, D-69126, Heidelberg, Germany
joachim.pfannschmidt{at}thoraxklinik-heidelberg.de

	Abstract

Top Abstract Patients and methods Results Discussion Conclusion References

 
OBJECTIVE: Surgical resection is an important form of treatment for pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma. We analyzed the clinical course, outcome, and prognostic factors after surgery.

METHODS: Between 1985 and 2000, 167 patients (103 men, 64 women) underwent complete pulmonary resection of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Only patients who met the criteria for potentially curative operation, in particular, control of the primary tumor, ability to resect all metastatic disease, and no other extrapulmonary metastases, were included.

RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival was 32.4%. A significantly longer survival was observed in multivariate analysis in patients without lymph node involvement compared with patients with pulmonary or mediastinal lymph node metastases or both. The number of pulmonary metastases significantly influenced survival. In patients with a solitary metastasis, we observed a 5-year survival of 45%, whereas the rate was 19.8% in patients with more than a single metastasis. In multivariate analysis, we also found the prethoracotomy carcinoembryonic antigen serum level to be an independent significant prognostic factor for survival. In patients with a serum carcinoembryonic antigen level exceeding 5 ng/mL and in patients with a serum carcinoembryonic antigen level in the normal range, the 5-year survivals were 22.7% and 48.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that pulmonary resection of metastatic colorectal carcinoma is safe and results in long-term survival. Thoracic lymph node metastases, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level before metastasectomy, and the number of pulmonary metastases were identified as prognosis-related criteria for surgery.

The first resection of a pulmonary metastasis was performed by Divis in 1927.⁴ Since then, surgery remains the only effective treatment for patients with isolated pulmonary metastases. Several retrospective studies have shown that patients with isolated pulmonary metastases benefit from resection. The published 5-year survivals after pulmonary metastasectomy of colorectal origin range from 21% to 62%.^5-11 Resection of hepatic and pulmonary metastases, secondary to colorectal cancer, is also regarded as safe and results in long-term survival.¹² However, reliable simple prognostic factors are still in great demand. This article focuses on the outcome, long-term results, and factors associated with prolonged survival in a relatively large series of patients who underwent curative resection for metastatic colorectal cancer of the lungs.

	Patients and methods

Top Abstract Patients and methods Results Discussion Conclusion References

 
Between January 1985 and January 2000, 167 patients underwent complete resection of metastatic colorectal carcinoma at our institution. Table 1 is a summary of pertinent patient demographics. In all patients, the primary tumor was treated by curative resection. Tumor-node-metastasis classification revealed a T stage less than 4. Patients with a history of colorectal carcinoma and 1 or more pulmonary nodules were evaluated by physical examination, chest x-ray films, chest computed tomographic (CT) scans, ultrasonography of the abdomen, and bone scans. In cases of uncertain clinical or radiologic findings, further examinations were performed to exclude extrapulmonary metastases. The primary site was confirmed to be controlled by an abdominal CT scan or colonofiberscopy.

Cases were included only if the histologic features of the pulmonary metastases were compatible with the histology of the primary lesion and characteristic for pulmonary metastases of colorectal origin.

All patients were retrospectively analyzed for age and sex, primary tumor location, number and type of pulmonary resections, completeness of resection, number of pulmonary metastases, disease-free interval (DFI), infiltration of pulmonary or mediastinal lymph nodes, prethoracotomy carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) serum level, 30-day mortality, and long-term survival. The end point for the assessment of efficiency was death.

In total, 215 thoracic procedures were performed in 167 patients who underwent curative resection. The surgical approach was chosen according to the location and number of pulmonary nodules. The resection of peripherally located nodules was performed by sternotomy or, in case of bilateral metastases, by bilateral sequential approach (Table 1). The type of lung resection for metastasectomy ranged in most patients from wedge resection to various types of anatomic lung resections in selected cases (Table 1). When in doubt of the histology between the primary bronchial adenocarcinoma and metastases of colorectal origin in frozen sections, we then performed a lobectomy if the patient was an operable candidate for lobectomy. In 30 patients, we performed a lobectomy of a solitary lung mass that was subsequently determined to be a metastasis. Systematic hilar and mediastinal lymph node dissection were performed concurrently with all procedures. Systematic lymph node dissection includes 4 compartments in the right-sided thoracotomy (paratracheal, infracarinal, inferior mediastinal, and hilar) and 4 compartments in the left (aortic, infracarinal, inferior mediastinal, and hilar). A total of 186 thoracotomies were performed as initial surgical resection in patients with lung metastases of colorectal carcinomas compared with 29 thoracotomies in patients with recurrent pulmonary metastases. These 29 repeat resections were performed in 24 of the 167 patients who presented with recurrent pulmonary metastases after complete resection.

Statistical analysis
The data were analyzed by SPSS for Windows software (Statistical Package for Social Science, SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill).

Critical values of prognostic factors differentiating between patient groups with good and poor prognosis were determined by the crit level procedure described by Abel and colleagues¹³ The best cutoff value was defined as the value that best discriminated between good and poor prognosis. Probability of survival was then analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method¹⁴ using the date of pulmonary resection as the starting point. For patients who underwent bilateral sequential metastasectomy, the date of the second operation was used as the starting point. The significance of differences between subgroups was calculated using the log-rank test.¹⁵ The relationship between the single parameters in the test groups was calculated by the Fisher exact test.¹⁶ For the multivariate analysis of prognostic factors, the Cox model¹⁷ was used. Factors analyzed included age, sex, localization of the primary tumor, lymph node metastases, prethoracotomy serum CEA level, number of metastases, DFI, surgery for hepatic metastases, and repeated surgery.

	Results

Top Abstract Patients and methods Results Discussion Conclusion References

 
The 30-day mortality rate was 1.8% (3/167 patients). There were 2 postoperative deaths caused by septic multiorgan failure after postoperative pneumonia. One patient postoperatively developed sudden cardiac failure. The mean follow-up period of surviving patients (censored patients) was 58.6 ± 42.7 months (0.5-183.9 months). The cumulative 5-year survival of all patients was 32.4%, and the median survival was 40.2 months (Figure 1). Of the prognostic factors analyzed, age, sex, localization of the primary tumor, type of resection, DFI, complete resection of hepatic metastases, and repeated thoracotomy did not significantly influence survival. No significant difference in long-term survival was found in patients after lobectomy of a single lung metastasis compared with patients after wedge resection (P = .424). However, the number of metastases, lymph node involvement, and prethoracotomy CEA serum levels exceeding 5 ng/mL were found to be independent prognostic factors for survival after metastasectomy (Table 2).

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Probability of survival (death from any cause) of 167 patients after curative pulmonary resection of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Zero time on the abscisse represents the date of pulmonary resection.

Pulmonary and mediastinal lymph node metastases were found in 32 patients, whereas 135 patients demonstrated no evidence of lymph node metastases. The nodal status significantly influenced survival. The median survival time was 20.2 months in patients with pulmonary or mediastinal lymph node metastases or both compared with 47.1 months in patients without lymph node involvement (Table 2, Figure 2). In patients with a single pulmonary metastasis, lymph node involvement was found in 15 patients, whereas 69 patients have had no evidence of lymph node metastases.

View larger version (19K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Probability of survival (death from any cause) of patients with lymph node involvement compared with patients with no lymph node involvement. Zero time on the abscisse represents the date of pulmonary resection (log-rank test). Patients with no lymph node involvement tended to survive longer than those with metastatic lobar or hilar lymph nodes (P = .014). Patients with metastatic lobar or hilar lymph nodes had a survival advantage over patients with positive mediastinal lymph nodes (P = .023). No lymph nodes involved, n = 135 (black solid line); metastatic lobar or hilar lymph nodes, n = 16 (black dotted line); metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes, n = 16 (gray solid line).

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Probability of survival (death from any cause) of patients with elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) serum level versus patients with normal preoperative CEA serum level (P = .0057). Zero time on the abscissa represents the date of pulmonary resection (log-rank test). CEA 5 ng/mL or less, n = 52 (black solid line); CEA more than 5 ng/mL, n = 52 (gray solid line).

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Probability of survival (death from any cause) of patients with a single pulmonary metastasis versus more than 1 metastasis (P = .0013). Zero time on the abscissa represents the date of pulmonary resection (log-rank test). One metastasis, n = 84 (black solid line); more than 1 metastasis, n = 83 (gray solid line).

In 24 patients, repeat thoracotomies (1-3) were performed for recurrent lung metastases after the initial complete resection of pulmonary metastases. Repeat thoracotomy for recurrent lung metastases was not associated with an increase in morbidity or mortality or with a significant difference in survival (Table 2).

For multivariate analysis, 2 different models were applied. In a first model, including all patients, the number of lung metastases (1 vs >1) and lymph node involvement (metastatic vs tumor-free) were found to be independent prognostic factors (P = .0059 and P < .00001, respectively). In a second model, the serum CEA value (5 ng/mL vs >5 ng/mL) was included. Therefore, the statistical power was less informative, because only 104 patients with available CEA values could be included. However, in the latter model, serum CEA (P = .037) and lymph node involvement (P = .042) retained significance as independent prognostic factors, whereas the number of metastases showed a reduced, nonsignificant discriminatory power (P = .059) compared with the results found within the complete study population (Table 4).

	Discussion

Top Abstract Patients and methods Results Discussion Conclusion References

Age, sex, or location of the primary carcinoma (rectum vs colon) have, so far, never been reported as significant prognostic factors of survival.^9,18-20 Surgical procedures for resection in our study included unilateral thoracotomy, staged bilateral thoracotomy, and median sternotomy. When all metastases were resected, the method chosen did not influence long-term survival in our series. In contrast with our finding, Saito and colleagues¹⁹ reported a significantly lower survival for simultaneous operations versus a sequential mode of operation. In our study, we found no significant difference in long-term survival after lobectomy compared with wedge resection even in patients with a single lung metastasis.

Median sternotomy was considered the procedure of choice for the initial exploration in the first half of our study interval. Recently, in the era of high-resolution CT, median sternotomy was reserved for patients with bilateral peripherally located nodules. However, we, among others,²¹ believe that open thoracotomy, with thorough palpation of the inflated and deflated lung, remains mandatory even in the light of modern CT sensitivity. The video-assisted approach is only of diagnostic value.²²

In our study, lung resections were performed by removing pulmonary metastases with the most limited parenchymal resection permitting a curative resection.²³ Surgical resection by means of wedge resection, segmentectomy, and, in selected cases, lobectomy or pneumonectomy, was completed by a systematic interlobar, hilar, and mediastinal lymph node dissection.

Mediastinal and hilar lymph node involvement is rarely examined in the literature. Lymph node metastases in cases of pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma are being reported.^6,18,24-27 In our study, 32 patients were diagnosed with pulmonary or mediastinal lymph node metastases or both after performing lymph node dissection. Multivariate analysis showed a statistically significant difference in survival between patients with lymph node involvement and those without lymph node metastases. The median survival time was also significantly longer for the subgroup of patients with only pulmonary lymph node involvement versus the group of patients with pulmonary and mediastinal lymph node metastases. Suggesting that metastases themselves induce metastases remains intriguing. Thus, the belief that systematic mediastinal and hilar lymph node dissection is important offers a further understanding in pulmonary metastases and remains a significant prognostic factor. This may have an impact on further adjuvant treatment regimen. Consequently, any procedure sparing lymph node dissection should be regarded as incomplete. In 15 of 84 patients with a single metastasis, lymph node involvement was detected by systematic lymph node dissection. Thus, pulmonary resection of a single nodule by video-assisted endoscopic surgery without systematic mediastinal and hilar lymph node dissection is not recommended.

In assessing the mediastinal lymph nodes for the possible presence of metastatic tumor, a positive CT result (lymph nodes > 1.0 cm) was confirmed in 7 of 16 patients by positive histologic evaluation (false negative rate: 56%). In our current approach, the histologic evaluation of enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes must always be performed, because the finding of metastatic nodal involvement would determine inoperability or indicate a systemic chemotherapy. In a patient with a history of colorectal cancer and multiple pulmonary nodules and significant mediastinal lymph node enlargement detected in the CT scan, we perform a mediastinoscopy (or other invasive diagnostics, eg, transbronchial needle aspiration). In case of positive nodes, we do not suggest pulmonary metastasectomy. If we detect positive lymph nodes during sequential metastasectomy on 1 side, we postpone the contralateral operation and suggest a systemic chemotherapy.

Recently, several reports have revealed that an elevated prethoracotomy serum CEA level showed a significant adverse effect on survival.^8,9

Multivariate analysis in our series also revealed the prethoracotomy CEA serum level to be an independent significant prognostic factor for survival. Although elevated CEA levels were an ominous prognostic finding, the 5-year survival was still 22.7% after pulmonary resection. Thus, we do not exclude patients with an elevated CEA level from surgery.

Approximately 50% of patients (84/167) presented with a solitary metastasis and demonstrated a significantly better survival compared with patients with multiple nodules. In addition, patients with up to 4 metastases (139/167) demonstrated a better survival than patients with more than 4 lesions.

At present, it seems that a patient with a solitary metastasis potentially benefits more from pulmonary resection than a patient with multiple pulmonary lesions.^6,9 By assigning patients to prognostic categories, including the parameters of number of metastases and lymph node involvement, we could take into account all of the 167 patients. This grouping system may be helpful in selecting patients for resection of pulmonary metastases (Figure 5).

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to the mode of metastases. Zero time on the abscisse represents the date of pulmonary resection (log-rank test). There was a significant survival advantage between the groups with lymph node involvement and single compared with multiple metastases (P = .002) and the groups with no lymph node involvement (multiple metastases) versus lymph node involvement (single metastasis) (P = .014). Within the group with lymph node involvement and a single metastasis compared with multiple metastases, no survival advantage was detected (P = .772). No lymph node involvement, 1 metastasis (black solid line); no lymph node involvement, more than 1 metastasis (black dotted line); metastatic thoracic lymph nodes, 1 metastasis (gray solid line); metastatic thoracic lymph nodes, more than one metastasis (gray dotted line).

At the time of the diagnosis of lung metastases, other metastases, for example, hepatic lesions, are frequently found. As many as 35% of patients presented with hepatic metastases at the time of exploration for resection of primary colon cancer.²⁹ Several authors reported similar results in survival analysis after pulmonary metastasectomy of patients in the presence of controlled hepatic metastases.^9,20 Similarly, we did not find a significant adverse effect on survival in patients after complete resection of hepatic metastases. Thus, we conclude that in selected patients, resection of solitary liver and lung metastases may provide longer palliation or result in resolution.^24,26,30

Another interesting result from our data is the finding that 5-year survival of patients who underwent repeated thoracotomies for recurrent pulmonary metastases did not differ significantly from the survival observed in patients who had only 1 thoracotomy. This indicated that repeated metastasectomy may set the clock back.

	Conclusion

Top Abstract Patients and methods Results Discussion Conclusion References

 
Resection of pulmonary metastases of colorectal cancer is a safe and effective treatment. Low morbidity and mortality rates, contrasted with the lack of an effective systemic chemotherapy, justify the aggressive approach of surgical treatment. Once metastases have been detected, resection should not be postponed. Patients that qualify best for pulmonary resection of lung metastases from colorectal cancer have a normal serum CEA level, no evidence of mediastinal or hilar lymph node involvement, and a low number of lung metastases (eg, <4). Repeat resection for recurrent lung metastases is warranted. In selected patients, resection of solitary liver and lung metastases may provide longer palliation or may result in resolution. Lifelong surveillance is necessary to detect recurrent disease. Pulmonary resection of colorectal carcinoma is regarded as safe and effective, although the factors that determine long-term survival are not completely understood.

	References

Top Abstract Patients and methods Results Discussion Conclusion References

 

1. August DA, Ottow RT, Sugerbaker PH. Clinical prospective of human colorectal cancer metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1984;3:303–324[Medline]
   
2. McCormack PM, Burt ME, Bains MS, Martini N, Rusch VW, Ginsberg RJ. Lung resection for colorectal metastases. 10-year results. Arch Surg. 1992;127:1403–1406[Abstract]
   
3. Poon MA, O’Connell MJ, Moertel CG, et al. Biochemical modulation of fluorouracil: evidence of significant improvement of survival and quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1989;7:1407–1418[Abstract]
   
4. Divis G. Ein Beitrag zur operativen Behandlung der Lungengeschwuuilste. Acta Chir Scand. 1927;62:329–334
   
5. Zanella A, Marchet A, Mainente P, Nitti D, Lise M. Resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1997;23:424–427[Medline]
   
6. Okumura S, Kondo H, Tsuboi M, et al. Pulmonary resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: experiences with 159 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112:867–874[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
7. Girard P, Ducreux M, Baldeyrou P, et al. Surgery for lung metastases from colorectal cancer: analysis of prognostic factors. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:2047–2053[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
8. Baron O, Amini M, Duveau D, Despins P, Sagan CA, Michaud JL. Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Five-year survival and main prognostic factors. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1996;10:347–351[Abstract]
   
9. McAfee MK, Allen MS, Trastek VF, Ilstrup DM, Deschamps C, Pairolero PC. Colorectal lung metastases: results of surgical excision. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;53:780–786[Abstract]
   
10. Sauter ER, Bolton JS, Willis GW, Farr GH, Sardi A. Improved survival after pulmonary resection of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 1990;43:135–138[Medline]
    
11. Mori M, Tomoda H, Ishida T, et al. Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal adenocarcinoma. Special reference to repeated pulmonary resections. Arch Surg. 1991;126:1297–1302[Abstract]
    
12. Headrick JR, Miller DL, Nagorney DM, et al. Surgical treatment of hepatic and pulmonary metastases from colon cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:975–980[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
13. Abel U, Berger J, Wiebelt H. CRITLEVEL: an exploratory procedure for the evaluation of quantitative prognostic factors. Methods Inf Med. 1984;23:154–156[Medline]
    
14. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–481
    
15. Peto R, Peto J. Asymptomatically efficient rank invariant test procedures. J R Stat Soc. 1972;135(Ser A):185–206
    
16. Fisher RA. Statistical methods for research workers. 14th ed. London: Olives and Boyd Limited; 1970. p. 354
    
17. Cox DR. Regression models and life-table. [with discussion]J R Stat Soc Series. 1972;34:187–220
    
18. Goya T, Miyazawa N, Kondo H, Tsuchiya R, Naruke T, Suemasu K. Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer. 10-year follow-up. Cancer. 1989;64:1418–1421[Medline]
    
19. Saito Y, Omiya H, Kohno K, et al. Pulmonary metastasectomy for 165 patients with colorectal carcinoma: A prognostic assessment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124:1007–1013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
20. Yano T, Hara N, Ichinose Y, Yokoyama H, Miura T, Ohta M. Results of pulmonary resection of metastatic colorectal cancer and its application. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;106:875–879[Abstract]
    
21. Dowling RD, Landreneau RJ, Miller DL. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for resection of lung metastases. Chest. 1998;113(1 Suppl):2S–5S[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
22. Loehe F, Kobinger S, Hatz RA, Helmberger T, Loehrs U, Fuerst H. Value of systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection during pulmonary metastasectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:225–229[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
23. Jauch KW, Koebe HG, Piltz S, Hertlein H, Dienemann H. [Surgery of metastases—can surgery of metastases be radical?]. Zentralbl Chir. 1993;118:508-15
    
24. Cahan WG, Castro EB, Hajdu SI. Therapeutic pulmonary resection of colonic carcinoma metastatic to lung. Dis Colon Rectum. 1974;17:302–309[Medline]
    
25. Regnard JF, Grunenwald D, Spaggiari L, et al. Surgical treatment of hepatic and pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancers. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:214–219[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
26. Lehnert T, Knaebel HP, Duck M, Bulzebruck H, Herfarth C. Sequential hepatic and pulmonary resections for metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1999;86:241–243[Medline]
    
27. Inoue M, Kotake Y, Nakagawa K, Fujiwara K, Fukuhara K, Yasumitsu T. Surgery for pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:380–383[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
28. Brister SJ, de Varennes B, Gordon PH, Sheiner NM, Pym J. Contemporary operative management of pulmonary metastases of colorectal origin. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31:786–792[Medline]
    
29. Bengmark S, Hafstrom L. The natural history of primary and secondary malignant tumors of the liver. I. The prognosis for patients with hepatic metastases from colonic and rectal carcinoma by laparotomy. Cancer. 1969;23:198–202[Medline]
    
30. Robinson BJ, Rice TW, Strong SA, Rybicki LA, Blackstone EH. Is resection of pulmonary and hepatic metastases warranted in patients with colorectal cancer? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117:66–76[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. F. Chong The optimal timing to resect pulmonary metastasis Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2008; 34(6): 1272 - 1273. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Tanaka, Y. Maniwa, W. Nishio, M. Yoshimura, and Y. Okita The optimal timing to resect pulmonary metastasis Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 33(6): 1135 - 1138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Nakajima, K. Yasufuku, A. Iyoda, S. Yoshida, M. Suzuki, Y. Sekine, K. Shibuya, K. Hiroshima, Y. Nakatani, and T. Fujisawa The evaluation of lymph node metastasis by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: Crucial for selection of surgical candidates with metastatic lung tumors. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2007; 134(6): 1485 - 1490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Nakajima, T. Murakawa, T. Fukami, A. Sano, M. Sugiura, and S. Takamoto Is Finger Palpation at Operation Indispensable for Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer? Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2007; 84(5): 1680 - 1684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Welter, J. Jacobs, T. Krbek, B. Krebs, and G. Stamatis Long-Term Survival After Repeated Resection of Pulmonary Metastases From Colorectal Cancer Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2007; 84(1): 203 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Pfannschmidt, H. Dienemann, and H. Hoffmann Surgical Resection of Pulmonary Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Published Series Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2007; 84(1): 324 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. D. Yan, J. King, A. Sjarif, D. Glenn, K. Steinke, A. Al-Kindy, and D. L. Morris Treatment Failure After Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Nonsurgical Candidates With Pulmonary Metastases From Colorectal Carcinoma Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2007; 14(5): 1718 - 1726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Furak, I. Trojan, T. Szoke, L. Tiszlavicz, J. Eller, and G. Lazar Visceral pleural infiltration as a negative prognostic factor in lung metastasis Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2007; 6(2): 196 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Takahashi, K. Nagai, N. Saito, M. Konishi, T. Nakagohri, N. Gotohda, M. Nishimura, J. Yoshida, and T. Kinoshita Multiple Resections for Hepatic and Pulmonary Metastases of Colorectal Carcinoma Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2007; 37(3): 186 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Welter, J. Jacobs, T. Krbek, C. Poettgen, and G. Stamatis Prognostic impact of lymph node involvement in pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 31(2): 167 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. D. Yan, J. King, A. Sjarif, D. Glenn, K. Steinke, and D. L. Morris Learning Curve for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Pulmonary Metastases From Colorectal Carcinoma: A Prospective Study of 70 Consecutive Cases Ann. Surg. Oncol., December 1, 2006; 13(12): 1588 - 1595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. D. Yan, J. King, A. Sjarif, D. Glenn, K. Steinke, and D. L. Morris Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Pulmonary Metastases from Colorectal Carcinoma: Prognostic Determinants for Survival Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2006; 13(11): 1529 - 1537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Yedibela, P. Klein, K. Feuchter, M. Hoffmann, T. Meyer, T. Papadopoulos, J. Gohl, and W. Hohenberger Surgical Management of Pulmonary Metastases from Colorectal Cancer in 153 Patients Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2006; 13(11): 1538 - 1544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Koga, J. Yamamoto, A. Saiura, T. Yamaguchi, E. Hata, and M. Sakamoto Surgical Resection of Pulmonary Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: Four Favourable Prognostic Factors Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2006; 36(10): 643 - 648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Iizasa, M. Suzuki, S. Yoshida, S. Motohashi, K. Yasufuku, A. Iyoda, K. Shibuya, K. Hiroshima, Y. Nakatani, and T. Fujisawa Prediction of prognosis and surgical indications for pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 82(1): 254 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Melloni, C. Doglioni, A. Bandiera, A. Carretta, P. Ciriaco, G. Arrigoni, and P. Zannini Prognostic Factors and Analysis of Microsatellite Instability in Resected Pulmonary Metastases From Colorectal Carcinoma Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 81(6): 2008 - 2013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Casali, A. Stefani, E. Storelli, and U. Morandi Prognostic factors and survival after resection of lung metastases from epithelial tumours Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2006; 5(3): 317 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Pfannschmidt, J. Klode, T. Muley, H. Dienemann, and H. Hoffmann Nodal Involvement at the Time of Pulmonary Metastasectomy: Experiences in 245 Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 448 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Shiono, G. Ishii, K. Nagai, J. Yoshida, M. Nishimura, Y. Murata, K. Tsuta, Y. H. Kim, Y. Nishiwaki, T. Kodama, et al. Predictive Factors for Local Recurrence of Resected Colorectal Lung Metastases Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 1040 - 1045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Inoue Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 80(2): 791 - 791. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Shiono, G. Ishii, K. Nagai, J. Yoshida, M. Nishimura, Y. Murata, K. Tsuta, Y. Nishiwaki, T. Kodama, and A. Ochiai Histopathologic Prognostic Factors in Resected Colorectal Lung Metastases Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 79(1): 278 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Tamura, M. Oda, Y. Tsunezuka, I. Matsumoto, K. Kawakami, and G. Watanabe Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in metastatic pulmonary tumor from colorectal carcinoma: Utility as a prognostic factor J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2004; 128(4): 517 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Inoue, M. Ohta, K. Iuchi, A. Matsumura, K. Ideguchi, T. Yasumitsu, K. Nakagawa, K. Fukuhara, H. Maeda, S.-i. Takeda, et al. Benefits of surgery for patients with pulmonary metastases from colorectal carcinoma Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 78(1): 238 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Joachim Pfannschmidt Hendrik Dienemann Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pfannschmidt, J.