|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:975-981
© 2004 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for congenital heart disease |
a Ste-Justine Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
b Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
c Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Read at the Eighty-third Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Boston, Mass, May 4-7, 2003.
Received for publication May 13, 2002; revisions received October 2, 2003; accepted for publication October 6, 2003.
* Address for reprints: Roger B. B. Mee, MB, ChB, FRACS, Center for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Unit M41, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
meer{at}ccf.org
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Thirty-nine patients (Royal Children's Hospital, 19; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 20) with a median age of 10.8 years (range, 13 months24 years) entered this protocol a median of 10.3 years (range, 0.5-24 years) after an atrial switch procedure.
RESULTS: The median duration of pulmonary artery banding was 13 months (range, 0.5-5.4 years). Ten (28%) patients responded unfavorably to morphologically left ventricular reconditioning (5 mortalities: 4 transplantations and 1 PAB still in place). Twenty-four (83%) of the 29 patients who underwent an atrial switch operation and atrial reseptation survived. During a median follow-up period of 8.2 years (range, 1-16 years), 3 patients had cardiac-related deaths. All 18 long-term survivors are asymptomatic. At last echocardiographic evaluation, the morphologically left ventricular function was normal or mildly decreased in 16 (89%) patients, and all had normal or mildly decreased systemic right ventricular function with no or mild tricuspid regurgitation. Age greater than 12 years was associated with a greater probability of morphologically left ventricular failure and not completing the protocol (P = .02) and a higher operative mortality at anatomic correction (P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: Morphologically left ventricular reconditioning and an anatomic correction protocol should be integrated into a cardiac transplantation program when treating patients with morphologically right ventricular failure after Mustard and Senning procedures. It is an alternative to cardiac transplantation in selected patients, with good long-term results. The response to morphologically left ventricular reconditioning past adolescence is inconsistent.
At the Royal Childrens' Hospital (RCH), a morphologically left ventricle (mLV) retraining and anatomic correction protocol was developed by the senior author and published in 1986.5 The protocol reintroduces the mLV into the systemic circulation and places the mRV in the pulmonary circuit, alleviating the strain of the systemic circulation on the mRV and resulting in improved mRV function and regression of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Because the mLV rapidly decreases in mass shortly after birth, it becomes incapable of supporting systemic circulation unless there is persistent pulmonary hypertension or mLV outflow tract obstruction that mimics the afterload of the systemic circuit. The mLV is first retrained to maintain systemic pressures by means of pulmonary artery banding (PAB), which increases mLV afterload. Once the mLV can provide systemic pressure, an anatomic correction is performed that consists of an atrial baffle takedown, an atrial septum reconstruction, and an ASO. Cardiac transplantation has been integrated into the treatment protocol since 1988. The lack of donor hearts still claiming the lives of 20% to 30% of patients on both adult and pediatric transplantation waiting lists and the annual mortality rate of approximately 2.5% per year during the first 10 years after transplantation6 were additional motivations to further perfect this protocol.
Since 1981, at the RCH (1981-1993) and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF; 1993-2002), a PAB and anatomic correction protocol has been offered to patients with progressive and symptomatic mRV dysfunction. Patients excluded from this protocol and eventual transplantation candidates have irreversible mLV dysfunction, pulmonary valve abnormalities rendering it unsuitable as a neoaortic valve, mLV outflow tract obstruction that cannot be adequately relieved, and uncontrolled arrhythmia.
The aim of this work is 4-fold: (1) report our results with this protocol; (2) establish which patients are more likely to respond favorably to mLV retraining and anatomic correction; (3) define the role of PAB as a sole treatment modality; and (4) determine the place for this protocol in 2002 with the majority of the atrial baffle population now older than 20 years.
| Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cardiac transplantation began in 1988 at the RCH. Eleven (58%) of the 19 patients operated on at the RCH were entered into the mLV retraining and anatomic correction protocol before the establishment of the cardiac transplantation program. Of the 20 patients treated at the CCF, 4 (20%) were not transplant candidates.
Preprotocol cardiac catheterization was performed in all 39 patients. Four patients (ages 2.2, 10.8, 16.5, and 20 years) with mLV outflow tract obstruction (n = 2) or pulmonary hypertension caused by atrial baffle obstruction (n = 2) had an mLV capable of generating systemic pressures (100, 90, 98, and 84 mm Hg), and therefore an anatomic correction was performed without preliminary PAB. All 4 patients had mild or moderate mRV dysfunction and TR with a normally functioning mLV and no mitral regurgitation (MR) documented by means of echocardiography.
The remaining 35 (90%) patients had mLV systolic pressures (mLVPs) that could not sustain systemic pressures with median mLVPs of 34 mm Hg (range, 17-65 mm Hg; mean, 36.4 ± 13 mm Hg) and a median ratio of the mLV and mRV systolic pressures of 0.30 (range, 0.18-0.6; mean, 0.35 ± 0.11). Preprotocol echocardiographic evaluation of these patients showed severe mRV dysfunction in 9 (26%) patients, moderate dysfunction in 22 (63%) patients, and mild dysfunction in 4 (11%) patients. Concomitant TR was severe in 13 (37%) patients and moderate in 17 (48%) patients. Mild TR with moderate-to-severe mRV dysfunction was observed in 5 (14%) patients. All patients with mild mRV dysfunction had severe TR. Moderate mLV dysfunction was observed in 1 patient, and mild dysfunction was observed in 2 patients, including one with moderate MR. Fourteen patients evaluated after 1995 underwent pre-PAB cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The median mLV indexed mass was 52.5 g/m2 (range, 31-105 g/m2; mean, 55 ± 19 g/m2), with the normal value being greater than 80 g/m2.
Protocol
Details of the treatment protocol and surgical technique, including illustrations, can be found in previous publications.7-9 A few important points of the protocol are outlined below.
PAB
Invasive monitoring includes a Swan-Ganz catheter in patients heavier than 15 kg to record mLV pressures during PAB. It is floated into the mLV, and the balloon is kept inflated and positioned in the middle of the mLV cavity, thus avoiding arrhythmias induced by the catheter. Through a median sternotomy, the band is applied and tightened until the systemic blood pressure decreases and the central venous pressure increases, achieving a 20- to 50-mm-Hg mLV pressure increase. A transesophageal echocardiograph documents the effects of the PAB on mRV and mLV size and function, septal position, and tricuspid valve function. A shift in the interventricular septum with an increase in mLV pressures and reduction of the TR and mRV dysfunction are sought. A tight band can reduce mLV function, decrease the contractility of the mLV, and induce MR. Dopamine (2.5-5 µg · kg1 · min1) or dobutamine (2.5-5 µg · kg1 · min1) is started on leaving the operating room and continued for the first 5 days of mLV retraining. On the first postoperative day, digoxin and diuretics are started, and if the mLV function remains good on control transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), the patient is extubated. One week after banding, after discontinuation of dopamine, a TTE is repeated, and MRI is used to evaluate ejection fraction and ventricular mass. Myocardial hypertrophy caused by cellular edema identified at T2-weighted MRI analysis is a probable sign of myocardial damage and might result in late scarring and mLV dysfunction. A cardiac catheterization is also performed before discharge to evaluate ventricular pressures. If there is any evidence of mLV failure, the pulmonary artery band is loosened immediately. If the mLV pressure has decreased since the operation and there is no sign of mLV compromise, the pulmonary artery band is tightened during the same hospitalization.
mLV function and pressures are assessed every 3 months by means of TTE and by means of cardiac catheterization every 6 months. Before the switch conversion, a TTE, a cardiac catheterization, and MRI are performed to determine whether anatomic correction is feasible. The mLV must function normally, generating greater than 80% systemic blood pressures and suprasystemic pressures with the administration of isoproterenol. The MRI evaluation, echocardiographic evaluation, or both should show normal ventricular mass and ventricular wall thickness indexed for weight and age. If these criteria are not met, PAB is repeated. If mLV dysfunction is observed, PAB is not tolerated, or both, patients are listed for transplantation if they are in end-stage heart failure, have deteriorating functional class, and have a limited life expectancy.
Anatomic correction
Technical details of the arterial switch, Mustard-Senning takedown, and atrial septum reconstruction are illustrated in previous reports.7-9
Postoperatively, the mLV function is optimized with aggressive afterload reduction by using phenoxybenzamine (0.5 mg/kg every 8 hours), nitroprusside, or both during the immediate postoperative period. Dopamine, dobutamine, milrinone, or a combination of these agents is added to further improve cardiac output. Nitroglycerin (0.5-5.0 µg · kg1 · min1) is administered to prevent coronary vasospasm. Chronic oral afterload reduction is begun once the patient is extubated. Biventricular function is monitored with serial TTE perioperatively and periodically after discharge.
| Statistical methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The significance of continuous variables on early mortality was determined by means of the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Categoric variables were analyzed with the use of a
2 test or a Fisher exact 2-tailed test if one of the numerators of the proportion was equal to or less than 5 events.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The clinical course after PAB is outlined in Figure 1. Early postoperative mortality after PAB was 3% (1/39). The only early postoperative death was a 6-month-old child with severe TR and mRV dysfunction after a Senning procedure who underwent a PAB with a concomitant tricuspid valve replacement before cardiac transplantation was available in Melbourne in 1988. There were 4 late deaths, 2 of which were also before 1988 and occurred in patients with severe mRV failure who did not tolerate PAB. Another patient with a significant baffle leak and obstruction was debanded immediately postoperatively because of hemodynamic instability. The family later refused transplantation, and he died 2 months later from progressive mRV dysfunction and TR. Another child died 2 months after PAB of ventricular tachycardia. Cardiac transplantation was performed in 4 patients who presented with mLV dysfunction 2 months to 4 years after PAB. One patient with initial moderate mRV dysfunction and TR has been banded for 5.5 years and remains asymptomatic, with only mild mRV dysfunction and TR in addition to a normally functioning mLV. The remaining 25 (71%) patients were successfully retrained and presented for ASO and atrial reseptation.
|
|
|
During a median follow-up period of 8.2 years (range, 1-17 years; mean, 8.3 ± 4.8 years), 2 children with progressive biventricular failure were transplanted 1 and 2 years after anatomic correction. There were 3 late deaths, all of progressive mLV failure. One young adult had refused transplantation, a child died before transplantation was available, and a third patient died 14 months postoperatively of congestive heart failure.
The 18 long-term survivors are doing very well in NYHA functional class 1 or 2. Thirteen (72%) patients are in sinus rhythm, a sick sinus syndrome persists in 3 (17%) patients, and isolated premature ventricular beats were observed in 2 (11%) patients. Four patients subsequently had aortic insufficiency, and 2 have undergone aortic valve replacement. Three patients have dilated aortic roots and are followed closely. Follow-up echocardiography revealed the presence of moderate and severe mLV dysfunction in 2 patients, and the remaining 16 have no or mild mLV dysfunction. MR, TR, and mRV dysfunction was either absent or mild in all patients.
Of the 4 patients with no prior mLV retraining, a successful anatomic correction was performed in 2 patients: one patient underwent transplantation after postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and another died after the operation.
Overall, of the 39 patients initially enrolled in this program, there are 29 (74%) long-term survivors: 18 anatomic correction survivors in NYHA functional class 1 or 2 who were transplant free, 7 patients doing well after transplantation, and 1 patient who is still banded in NYHA functional class 1.
Variables evaluated as potential risk factors for failed anatomic correction (postoperative death, mLV failure leading to transplantation, or both) after ASO and atrial reseptation are listed in Table 2. Older age significantly increased the probability of failing anatomic correction. The oldest patient to successfully undergo ASO and reseptation and thus complete the protocol was 16.5 years of age. Fifteen (62%) of the 24 patients younger than 12 years of age at the start of the protocol successfully completed mLV retraining and anatomic correction, whereas the success rate was significantly less (3/15 [20%] patients) in patients older than 12 years (P = .02). The presence of arrhythmia before anatomic correction was significantly higher in patients who failed conversion (P = .02). Although the occurrence of coronary pattern other than Yacoub type A or D did not reach significance, 4 of the 5 early deaths after conversion had difficult coronary anatomies (single coronary ostium off of sinus 2, n = 2; single coronary ostium off of sinus 1, n = 1; and 1 with multiple coronary ostia, n = 2). Preconversion mLVPs were significantly higher in the patients who successfully underwent anatomic correction (P = .03); however, there was no definitive mLVP cutoff identified that could reliably predict successful conversion. Furthermore, the presence of severe mRV dysfunction was associated with a higher failure rate (P = .05), possibly because of an inadequate increase in mLVP and thus a less important shift in the interventricular septum. The type of atrial baffle, concomitant procedures, the era in which the operation was performed, and mLV indexed mass at MRI were not significantly different between the 2 groups.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is now well established that the mLV geometry influences that of the mRV, which explains the improvement of the mRV and TR with PAB.9-13 As the mLV pressure increases during retraining, the ventricular septum will shift from a leftward to a midline position, and the mRV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes will decrease. This improves tricuspid valve leaflet coaptation, decreasing TR. A decrease in TR translates into a reduction in mRV volume load and improved function.
PAB can act as a bridge to transplantation or delay listing for transplantation by improving mRV function and TR. It has proved to be safe in our patient population and by other authors.10,13 In our cohort there were no early deaths and only one late death caused by ventricular arrhythmia because this protocol was done in conjunction with cardiac transplantation. In our experience PAB can be performed in patients with severe mRV failure; however, patients with atrial arrhythmias are less likely to respond favorably to PAB. Other factors, namely preprotocol mLV mass and pressure, do not reliably predict which patients will successfully complete mLV retraining. Progressive mLV afterload augmentation is vital because overzealous PAB can induce mLV failure. A reliable and adjustable PAB procedure has yet to be described and would limit the number of interventions needed to retrain the mLV.
It is clear that the response to mLV retraining and anatomic conversion is inconsistent in adolescents and adults on the basis of not only our data but also those of other authors.8,10-12 Successful mLV retraining in our series was less frequent in patients older than 12 years of age, although a 16.5-year-old patient is among the long-term survivors of the conversion protocol. This inconsistent response to mLV retraining in older patients is an important problem because the vast majority of patients undergoing an ASO are now older than 20 years.
Why is there such variability in mLV retraining responses? How does age affect mLV retraining? Inadequate myocardial perfusion in the presence of sudden increased cardiac work during PAB and induced myocardial hypertrophy is a probable culprit. In fetuses and immature animals the coronary reserve is normal in the presence of pressure-induced hypertrophy.15-18 Adult hearts, however, have less myocardial perfusion reserve with hypertrophy produced by an increase in afterload, resulting in myocardial ischemia with acute stress.19,20 Reduced coronary flow reserve is thought to be caused by a decrease in capillary density,21 a relative decrease in large-caliber coronary arteries,22 and/or obstruction of intramural coronary arteries caused by an increase in extravascular pressures.21 Furthermore, coronary anatomy other than Yacoub type A and D, including single, intramural, and multiple coronary ostia, seem to be associated with ischemia-related cardiac failure and death after ASO and atrial reseptation. An acute increase in afterload during retraining in older patients can therefore cause ischemic changes that contribute to mLV failure. The Birmingham group has performed mLV biopsies before and after retraining to determine whether there is evidence of ischemic damage or fibrosis of the mLV, opting for transplantation if fibrosis was present.22 We have instead used T2-weighted MRI to locate myocardial edema caused by ischemia after PAB, which we believe is the precursor to fibrosis. An MRI is performed 1 week after PAB. If myocardial edema is identified and if there is evidence of LV dysfunction, the pulmonary artery band is loosened immediately. We are in the process of trying to correlate MRI findings with histology of explanted hearts and autopsy findings to validate this imaging tool.
On the basis of our data, the mLV retraining protocol can be offered as part of a 2-tiered treatment program with cardiac transplantation. ASO and atrial reseptation should be reserved for those with no identified risk factors, particularly adolescents and young adults. In addition to patients with coronary anomalies and signs of myocardial ischemia, patients with mLVPs that are less than systemic and atrial arrhythmias are not candidates for anatomic correction. Atrial arrhythmias have, however, been addressed at anatomic correction with cryoablation techniques, with some success in 2 patients in a recent publication by Mavroudis and Backer.10
The small number of patients in our study precludes statistical analysis of the relative contributions of the anatomic variants and hemodynamic parameters on the response to the various steps of the protocol. All but one patient in this study was cared for by the senior author in both institutions, therefore limiting interhospital variation.
In conclusion, the age of patients undergoing Mustard and Senning procedures who present with mRV failure will be increasing, as seen in our cohort, with the patient population at the RCH being younger (median, 9.2 years; range, 0.6-16.1 years) in comparison with the more recent patients treated at the CCF (median, 13.9 years; range, 2.1-24 years; P = .007). The prevalence of mRV failure will probably increase as more and more patients reach their third decade. mLV reconditioning and anatomic correction is an alternative to cardiac transplantation in selected patients, with good long-term results.
The response to mLV reconditioning past adolescence is inconsistent. Although anecdotal reports of successful ASO and reseptation have been reported in adults, on the basis of our data, this should be done on a highly selected basis. A clear cutoff age was not identified in our study. The presence of complex coronary anatomy, severe mRV failure, and supraventricular arrhythmias are associated with a decreased conversion rate, decreased survival, or both, and thus transplantation, as a primary treatment modality, should be considered in these patients.
PAB, as a sole treatment modality, can improve mRV function and reduce TR, thus acting as a bridge to transplantation.
The results of ASO and reseptation and other conventional therapies, including cardiac transplantation, are imperfect, and other therapeutic modalities need to be developed. Adjuncts that stimulate mLV hypertrophy (ie, genetic modulation or myocyte transplantation) and angiogenesis (ie, angiogenic growth factors) are now being developed and will possibly improve the retraining response.14
Discussion
Dr Constantine Mavroudis (Chicago, Ill). Drs Poirier and Mee and their colleagues have presented their cumulative experience with left ventricular retraining for the purpose of converting transposition patients with failed atrial baffle operations to arterial switch. The idea, of course, is to resuscitate the left ventricle as the systemic pumping chamber, resulting in long-term benefit and survival. Notably, this is the largest existing clinical experience with this operative paradigm. Roger Mee and his group have pioneered this approach and now present an analysis with enough patients to perform meaningful comparisons and trends. Congratulations, Dr Poirier, on a beautiful and excellent presentation.
Our experience with this approach is limited to 11 patients, and it mirrors the outcomes that have been presented today. We also found that atrial arrhythmias have been troubling. Because of this, we performed concomitant atrial arrhythmia surgery in 2 patients, which resulted in arrhythmia ablation in both. One patient did well, and the other died from left ventricular failure caused by unrecognized poor left ventricular preparation. We did not believe that the small addition of the atrial arrhythmia surgery participated in the death of this patient. Did you consider adding arrhythmia surgery to your protocol, which might address this formidable issue that you have raised?
In your article you mentioned that the Birmingham group in the United Kingdom has instituted left ventricular biopsies at the time of PAB to help them decide between transplantation and arterial switch. What do you believe is the efficacy of this procedure, and are you planning to institute this in your program?
This is a significant contribution. I would like to congratulate the authors, and I would like to thank the Association for the privilege of discussing this article.
Dr Poirier. Thank you, Dr Mavroudis, for your pertinent questions. Our study has shown that the patients with atrial arrhythmias were less likely to successfully complete the retraining protocol and thus less likely to undergo anatomic correction. Anatomic correction, particularly in the older patients, has a high operative risk and is technically challenging. The additional procedure should probably be avoided. We believe that patients with atrial arrhythmia are probably best served with transplantation.
Myocardial biopsies are an interesting tool and can potentially identify which patients respond favorably to mLV retraining and are more likely to tolerate anatomic correction. We have instead used T2-weighted MRI to locate myocardial edema caused by ischemia after PAB, which we believe is the precursor to fibrosis. An MRI is performed 1 week after PAB. If myocardial edema is identified, and if there is evidence of LV dysfunction, the pulmonary artery band is loosened immediately. We are in the process of trying to correlate MRI findings with histology of explanted hearts and autopsy findings to validate this imaging tool.
Dr Charles D. Fraser (Houston, Tex). We have had limited experience with this population of patients as well. The one problem that we have struggled with is the dilation of the pulmonary artery, which will become the neoaorta during the period of banding, and I wonder if you could offer some specific tricks on how to deal with that.
Dr Poirier. There are 3 long-term survivors in our cohort of patients who had a dilated neoaorta. Other authors, including Dr Mavroudis, have also reported this. Subjecting the neoaorta to high pressures during PAB might play a part in this dilation; however, dilation does not appear in all patients who have undergone initial left ventricular retraining. We did notice that patients who required a pulmonary valve repair at anatomic correction were more likely to dilate. Possibly medial necrosis plays a part in this dilation, as in other congenital anomalies. We have yet to come up with any tricks to avoid this complication.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Horer, E. Karl, G. Theodoratou, C. Schreiber, J. Cleuziou, Z. Prodan, M. Vogt, and R. Lange Incidence and results of reoperations following the Senning operation: 27 years of follow-up in 314 patients at a single center Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 33(6): 1061 - 1067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Laks, D. Marelli, M. Plunkett, and J. Myers Adult Congenital Heart Disease Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1431 - 1464. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Michael, G. R. Veldtman, J. R. Paisey, A. M. Yue, S. Robinson, S. Allen, N. S. Sunni, C. Kiesewetter, T. Salmon, P. R. Roberts, et al. Cardiac defibrillation therapy for at risk patients with systemic right ventricular dysfunction secondary to atrial redirection surgery for dextro-transposition of the great arteries Europace, May 1, 2007; 9(5): 281 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Mitropoulos, M. Kanakis, A. P. Vlachos, P. Lathridou, G. Tsaoussis, G. Georgiou, and J. A. Goudevenos Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries: Surgical Repair in Adulthood Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 83(2): 672 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Warnes Transposition of the Great Arteries Circulation, December 12, 2006; 114(24): 2699 - 2709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mollet, B. Stos, D. Bonnet, D. Sidi, and Y. Boudjemline Development of a device for transcatheter pulmonary artery banding: evaluation in animals Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2006; 27(24): 3065 - 3072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lange, J. Horer, M. Kostolny, J. Cleuziou, M. Vogt, R. Busch, K. Holper, H. Meisner, J. Hess, and C. Schreiber Presence of a Ventricular Septal Defect and the Mustard Operation Are Risk Factors for Late Mortality After the Atrial Switch Operation: Thirty Years of Follow-Up in 417 Patients at a Single Center Circulation, October 31, 2006; 114(18): 1905 - 1913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Boudjemline, E. Pineau, C. Bonnet, A. Mollet, S. Abadir, D. Bonnet, D. Sidi, and G. Agnoletti Off-label use of an adjustable gastric banding system for pulmonary artery banding J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2006; 131(5): 1130 - 1135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Alghamdi, B. W. McCrindle, and G. S. Van Arsdell Physiologic Versus Anatomic Repair of Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries: Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 81(4): 1529 - 1535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Warnes The Adult With Congenital Heart Disease: Born To Be Bad? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 5, 2005; 46(1): 1 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |