| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:504-511
© 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease |
a Harrison Department of Surgical Research
b Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa
Read at the Eighty-fourth Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, April 25-28, 2004.
Received for publication September 29, 2004; revisions received September 30, 2004; accepted for publication September 30, 2004. * Address for reprints: Robert C. Gorman, MD, Department of Surgery, 6 Silverstein Pavilion, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (E-mail: gormanr{at}uphs.upenn.edu).
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
METHODS: Infarction of 21% to 24% of the left ventricular mass was induced by means of coronary ligation in 77 sheep. Infarctions varied only by anatomic location in the left ventricle: anteroapical, n = 26; anterobasal, n = 16; laterobasal, n = 9; and posterobasal, n = 20. Six additional sheep had ring annuloplasty before posterobasal infarction. End-systolic and end-diastolic left ventricular volume, end-systolic muscle-to-cavity area ratio, left ventricular sphericity, ejection fraction, and degree of ischemic mitral regurgitation, as determined by means of quantitative echocardiography, were assessed before infarction and at 2, 5, and 8 weeks after infarction.
RESULTS: All infarcts resulted in significant postinfarction remodeling and decreased ejection fraction. Anteroapical infarcts lead to left ventricular aneurysms. Only posterobasal infarcts caused severe and progressive ischemic mitral regurgitation. Remodeling because of posterobasal infarcts was not more severe than that caused by infarcts at other locations. Furthermore, prophylactic annuloplasty prevented the development of mitral regurgitation after posterobasal infarction but had no effect on remodeling.
CONCLUSION: The extent of postinfarction remodeling is determined on the basis of infarct size and location. The development of ischemic mitral regurgitation might not contribute significantly to adverse remodeling. Ischemic mitral regurgitation is likely a manifestation rather than an important impetus for postinfarction remodeling.
It is widely believed that the surgical correction of IMR is beneficial, and most of the current literature has focused on whether valve repair or replacement is preferable.2,3 However, scant data exist to support the commonly held assumption that elimination of IMR improves survival or affects the remodeling process. In fact, the most credible data would suggest that the surgical treatment of IMR influences long-term survival very little.2-4
These clinical data, as well as experimental data from our laboratory,5 have led us to hypothesize that IMR is a manifestation of infarction-induced remodeling that does not significantly contribute to the process that leads to progressive ventricular dilatation and associated congestive heart failure.
Four ovine models of MI were used to test this hypothesis. Infarcts in all 4 models are similarly sized6-10 but involve different regions of the left ventricle (LV): anteroapical, anterobasal, laterobasal, and posterobasal. Only the posterobasal infarct model reliably results in significant IMR.7,9 The outcome of remodeling in a group of animals having an untreated posterobasal infarct was compared with remodeling induced by anteroapical, anterobasal, and laterobasal infarcts. The untreated posterobasal infarct group was also compared with a group of animals that had a ring annuloplasty device placed before posterobasal infarction with the intent of preventing the development of IMR (the posterobasal with annuloplasty [PBA] group). If IMR influences the remodeling process, the untreated posterobasal infarct group is expected to have more severe changes in LV size and shape than the other 4 groups of animals.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Surgical protocol
Dorset male hybrid sheep (Animal Biotech Industries, Doylestown, Pa) weighing 35 to 40 kg were used for this study. Animals were treated under an experimental protocol approved by the University of Pennsylvania's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and in compliance with the "Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals." Anesthesia was induced with thiopental sodium (10-15 mg/kg intravenously) and the animals were intubated. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane (1.5%-2%) and oxygen. Under aseptic conditions, all animals underwent left thoracotomy. Polypropylene snares were loosely placed around the appropriate coronary arteries. Seventy-one animals underwent closure of the thoracotomy and recovery. Six animals underwent placement of a 24-mm mitral annuloplasty ring (Carpentier-Edwards Physio, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calif) with standard cardiac surgical techniques after snares were placed to produce a posterobasal infarct. After termination of cardiopulmonary bypass, these animals underwent closure of the thoracotomy and recovered.5
Baseline data and infarction
Ten to 14 days after initial instrumentation, the sheep were again anesthetized. The surface electrocardiogram and arterial blood pressure were continuously monitored (Sonometrics Inc, London, Ontario, Canada) and recorded during all data collection procedures. A high-fidelity pressure transducer (SPC-350; Millar Instruments Inc, Houston, Tex) was inserted through a femoral artery into the LV for continuous LV pressure monitoring (78534c monitor; Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, Calif). A pulmonary artery catheter (131-h, 7F; Baxter Healthcare Corp, Deerfield, Ill) was placed; thermodilution cardiac output was measured in triplicate at each time point for each animal. Animals were disconnected from the ventilator and atrially paced at 120 beats/min during data collection. After baseline hemodynamic and echocardiographic data were recorded, the subcutaneous snares were exposed, tightened, and tied to produce infarction. Each animal received magnesium sulfate, bretylium tosylate (INN: bretylium tosilate), and lidocaine before infarction. Hemodynamic and echocardiographic data were again collected 30 minutes after infarction.
Echocardiography
Quantitative, 2-dimensional, subdiaphragmatic echocardiograms were obtained before infarction and at 30 minutes and 2, 5, and 8 weeks after infarction. A sterile midline laparotomy (or a right or left subcostal incision) was made, and subdiaphragmatic, quantitative, 2-dimensional echocardiographic images were obtained with a 5-MHz probe (77020A, Hewlett-Packard). Images were recorded on VHS videotape at 30 Hz (Panasonic AG-6300 VHS Recorder). LV short-axis images at 3 levels (the tips of the papillary muscles, the bases of the papillary muscles, and the apex) and 2 orthogonal long-axis views were recorded. Previous reports have validated the reproducibility and effectiveness of this technique for evaluating LV remodeling in sheep.5,12,13 LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) and LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) were calculated by using Simpson's rule.14 Ejection fraction was calculated from LVESV and LVEDV. End-systolic muscle-to-cavity area ratio (ESMCAR) was also determined at each time point. Ventricular sphericity at end systole was assessed as the ratio of LVESV to the volume of a sphere with a diameter equal to the LV long-axis dimension. This ratio approaches unity as the ventricle becomes more spherical. All measured echocardiographic indexes of remodeling were normalized to their baseline values. The degree of MR was determined quantitatively by assessing the area of the regurgitant jet as a percentage of left atrial area in the apical 4-chamber view. The following grading was used: grade 1, less than 20%; grade 2, 20% to 40%; grade 3, 40% to 60%; and grade 4, greater than 60%.15
Follow-up studies
Hemodynamic and echocardiographic data were collected at 30 minutes and 2, 5, and 8 weeks after infarction. After the 9-week study, the animals were put to death. The heart was excised and photographed to confirm infarction size and location.
Statistics
Measurements are reported as means ± SEM. Between-group differences in all continuous dependent variables (ie, all but MR grade) were compared by analysis of variance for repeated measures. If analysis of variance revealed significant differences, the Student t test with the Bonferroni correction was used to assess differences between groups at specific time points after infarction (SPSS, Chicago, Ill). Differences in the degree of MR between groups were assessed by the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. The Mann-Whitney test with the Bonferroni correction was used to evaluate the differences in MR between any 2 groups at specific time points.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
These findings, although seemingly counterintuitive, are consistent with clinical experience. The increasing incidence of IMR, combined with improved mitral valve repair techniques and a long history of surgical success in treating other valve diseases, has lead to heightened interest in and a very aggressive approach to IMR among surgeons and cardiologists. Most research has been focused on determining whether valve repair is preferable replacement or whether mild grades of IMR should be addressed surgically; however, the best and most recent clinical studies have failed to provide convincing evidence that the surgical treatment of IMR improves survival over medical management.2-4
The failure of IMR to measurably contribute to adverse remodeling in these relatively short-term ovine models is indicative of the extreme impetus for remodeling that a moderately sized transmural MI imposes on the LV. It appears that the lessons learned regarding the indications for intervention in isolated mitral valve disease might not be directly applicable to patients with IMR.
This report builds on and adds to earlier work from our laboratory comparing untreated remodeling after posterobasal infarction with prophylactic ring annuloplasty or prophylactic ventricular restraint. In the posterobasal infarct model, ring annuloplasty is highly effective in preventing the development of IMR but has no demonstrable effect on remodeling. In contrast, ventricular wrapping reduced acute infarct expansion, preserved ejection fraction, and significantly improved measured parameters of postinfarction remodeling. Additionally, ventricular wrapping was almost as effective as ring annuloplasty in preventing the development of IMR.5 These data led us to hypothesize that infarct expansion (stretching) is the critical inciting phenomenon that drives postinfarction remodeling. We further posited that well-recognized clinical phenomena, such as LV aneurysm and IMR, were likely just manifestations of remodeling that are dependent on infarct location but contribute little to perpetuating the remodeling process. By including the other infarct locations in this analysis, we were able to test these hypotheses and conclude that postinfarct remodeling is dependent on infarct size and occurs regardless of the infarct location, whether complicated by IMR or LV aneurysm. Therefore this study, in conjunction with our previous work,5,13,14,17,18 emphasizes infarct expansion as an important instigating mechanical phenomenon that drives remodeling and identifies it as a legitimate surgical target that might be exploited to prevent (rather than reverse) remodeling.
Recent laboratory19,20 and clinical21 studies have shown that expansion (stretching) of a transmural MI initiates a progressive myopathic process in normally perfused myocardium. This phenomenon is initially localized to myocardium immediately adjacent to the infarct but extends during the remodeling process to convert contiguous and normally perfused myocardium into hypocontractile remodeled myocardium. The stretch-induced myopathic process has been associated with myocyte apoptosis9 and disruption of the extracellular matrix caused by activation of matrix metalloproteinases.22 The failure of surgical reshaping operations to improve survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy strongly suggests that infarct-induced myopathy is very difficult to reverse once established.23-25 Using contrast echocardiography, Jackson and colleagues26 have demonstrated that early postinfarction geometric changes consistent with increased regional wall stress occur in the border region adjacent to infarcts undergoing early expansion and subsequent remodeling. A finite-element analysis by Guccione and coworkers19 confirms these findings and also demonstrates that once the myopathic process is fully developed, contractile function in nonischemic myocardium is impaired beyond what would be expected from changes in LV geometry and stress distribution. Therefore, early after infarction, loss of contractility is due to mechanical factors; as remodeling progresses, the geometric contribution (stress) to myocardial dysfunction is likely outstripped by the myopathic phenomenon that it initiates in normally perfused myocardium.
Although the results of this study are intriguing and provocative, there are limitations that warrant caution when generalizing the conclusions presented here to patients. It is not known whether the contribution of IMR to remodeling becomes progressively more important as infarct material properties change over time and infarct stretching becomes less of an impetus for remodeling. This question will be addressed by a longer and more clinically relevant follow-up period (ie, 6-12 months) of these ovine infarct models. Such experiments are ongoing in our laboratory. The current study did not address the affect of IMR on symptoms. It is widely believed that the surgical treatment of IMR improves heart failure symptoms and reduces subsequent hospitalization. Confirmation of this clinical impression would require a randomized clinical trial.
The data presented here contribute to a growing body of work that casts doubt on the ability of surgical procedures to affect longevity in patients with end-stage heart failure.2-4,22-24,27 All currently available operations are designed to address the structural manifestations of fully developed remodeling and are dependent on the assumption that the remaining uninfarcted myocardium is capable of better contractile function once a more normal geometry is established. The veracity of this assumption is becoming more dubious.
Discussion
Dr Frank W. Sellke (Boston, Mass). Doesn't this go against conventional wisdom and common sense. That is, if you have MR, you are going to have volume overload, and that has to contribute, at least in some way, to the geometry of the ventricle over time. Am I missing the point?
If you have a leaky valve, you are going to have different pressures within the heart, and you tend to have volume overload. How can that not contribute to the remodeling of the heart?
Dr Moainie. I think the pathology is located in the myocardium. Although there has to be some effect of the regurgitation in terms of volumes, it is so minuscule in terms of its effect that the true pathology lies in the myocardium and in the infarct-induced remodeling, and the variable is so minor that it really does not affect the results of the remodeling.
Dr Frank A. Pigula (Boston, Mass). Did you look at the left atrial dimensions at all, or did you assess left atrial function?
Dr Moainie. We did not focus on left atrial function. We looked at ventricular function and overall LV function.
Dr Bradley S. Allen (Houston, Tex). One question about your controls. Like Dr Sellke, I would have imagined that if you had mitral valve regurgitation, you would get some sort of volume overload and ventricular remodeling.
The question, therefore, is what happens if you just cause mitral valve regurgitation in hearts for 8 weeks without an infarction. Does the ventricle get bigger? If indeed there is ventricular enlargement (remodeling) in 8 weeks with just MR (no infarction), then it would follow that you are correct and the pathology is all in the ventricle. However, if the ventricular enlargement is minimal after 8 weeks of MR alone, then it might be that your time frame is too short to allow these conclusions because the MR has not had sufficient time to dilate the heart.
I would also echo what Dr Pigula was saying about left atrial size. If the MR increases left atrial size, this might lead to arrhythmias, and therefore it might still be important to correct the MR.
Dr Moainie. In response to your first question, the second set of experiments is more focused at addressing that issue. Because the only difference between those 2 groups of animals is the presence of MR, that is the only variable that is different. They have the identical infarct. Therefore, you would think that if the MR was the variable that was contributing—if it had any effect on the changes in volumes—that the group that had a prophylactic annuloplasty ring and therefore had no MR during the entire course of the study should, by virtue of that, have a decreased amount of dilatation. There should be some difference that is demonstrable at 8 weeks. Even though it is only 8 weeks, there should be a demonstrable change.
In terms of the time course, you can see that the control group does double at 8 weeks. Therefore, clearly the 8 weeks is long enough to demonstrate the pathology that occurs with ischemic disease. However, eliminating the MR made no difference. Therefore, it is hard to imagine that even if you followed those animals out for 16 weeks that anything would change in that course.
In terms of the arrhythmia issue, that is something that obviously should be addressed separately, but that was not the focus of this study.
Dr W. Randolph Chitwood, Jr (Greenville, NC). Have you done a similar type of study in which you induced ischemia alone and did not allow a true infarction to develop?
Dr Moainie. We have not. One of the advantages of sheep is that they have no collateral circulation, and therefore they are very pure models of infarction. But because they have no collaterals, for creating ischemia, you have to do this with amyloid constrictors or something other than localized infarcts, and we have not really delved into that area.
Dr Chitwood. So the clinical call here is that we are treating the symptoms of MR and not anything else. Is that the call?
Dr Moainie. I think the results of this study really beg for a clinical study that would look at just the question that you have posed, a study that would look at a randomized clinical study of treatment of IMR and not treatment of IMR in a group of patients to see whether, in fact, we are affecting survival at all or if we are purely operating on symptoms.
Dr Paul Kurlansky (Miami Beach, Fla). It is a very interesting study and a very provocative one. But I am a little concerned about too readily drawing the wrong clinical implications from it.
I think one thing that you are clearly dealing with here is the evolution of a cardiomyopathy and what the factors that cause remodeling might be, as it were. What is the remodeling process, and what are the key factors in the evolution of the remodeling process?
What it seems that you have shown fairly convincingly is that MR is not a key factor in the initial ischemic remodeling process. Whether or not MR has an aggravating or accelerating effect in the long term, once somebody has a cardiomyopathic process, it is a totally different issue.
These animals were followed up for 8 weeks. There are significant clinical data that seem to indicate that patients who already have established cardiomyopathy and have MR have a severely worse prognosis than those with cardiomyopathy who do not have MR. Therefore, it might be that although the MR is not key in the evolution of the cardiomyopathy, in the maintenance and long term and evolution and prognosis and ability to treat it, it might be a key factor. I also think that is something that is important to try to distinguish in the long-term evaluation of your results.
Dr Moainie. There are a number of ways one can look at the issue that you bring out. One of the ways that I look at it is that the presence of IMR in a group of patients with heart failure is simply a manifestation of the severity of their disease. That it, in fact, is kind of a chicken-or-egg phenomena. That it is not so much the cause of their failure, but it is just a manifestation of how severe their disease, in fact, is.
And something that would suggest that this is, in fact, the case, is that when you look at the survival data for surgery for IMR in the presence of failure, the survival data are not significantly different than those of heart failure in general. Therefore I think that, combined with the results of this study, this would suggest an indication to perform more intensive clinical investigation of this topic.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |
